New releases, music videos and album news — indie, rap, rock and pop. Always covering Ren, Chris Webby, Sam Tompkins, bbno$, CHINCHILLA, Muse, Yungblud and more.
David Walliams says he is “not a sexual predator” but admits behaving “thoughtlessly” as sexual misconduct allegations published
Developing story first seen 2 hours ago
The allegations against David Walliams have now been published after the High Court rejected his attempt to stop The Guardian and ITN releasing their investigation. Walliams denies the claims and says he is “not a sexual predator”, but acknowledges that he may have behaved “thoughtlessly” towards women in past relationships.
The investigation reports allegations of sexual misconduct and harassment by 30 women, dating back to the early 2000s; some say they were as young as 15 when contact began. Walliams said he regretted not always considering others’ feelings, but denied abusing the power associated with his fame or breaking the law. HarperCollins has stopped producing his books following separate harassment allegations by junior staff, and ITV News has released a documentary about the investigation.
- Sources
- 3
- Outlets
- 3
- Left · Centre · Right
- 0 · 0 · 2
In short
- The High Court allowed allegations against Walliams to be published.
- Thirty women are reported to have made allegations.
- Walliams denies wrongdoing but regrets thoughtless behaviour.
How this story developed
- 44 seconds ago Newly published reporting names David Walliams as the celebrity who tried, unsuccessfully, to prevent an investigation into allegations against him from being released.
- 14 minutes ago The allegations against David Walliams have now been published after the High Court rejected his attempt to stop The Guardian and ITN releasing their investigation.
- 1 hour ago David Walliams says he is “not a sexual predator” and denies wrongdoing, while acknowledging that he may have behaved thoughtlessly in past relationships.
- Daily Mail David Walliams live updates: Comedian says 'I am not a sexual predator' as he's named as celebrity who lost injunction bid
- Far Out David Walliams says he is “not a sexual predator” but admits behaving “thoughtlessly” as sexual misconduct allegations published
- New York Post Outed celebrity David Walliams addresses heinous sexual misconduct allegations, admits ‘regret’ about past behavior
Full account
David Walliams has said he is “not a sexual predator” and has denied breaking the law, while acknowledging that he may at times have behaved thoughtlessly in past relationships. His comments came as The Guardian and ITV News published allegations of sexual misconduct and harassment involving 30 women, following the end of a legal effort to prevent the reporting.
The allegations described by the outlets span from the early 2000s. Some women reportedly said they were teenagers when contact with Walliams began. The Daily Mail gives a more detailed account of one allegation: a woman who was 15 at the time said that, in 2007, Walliams took her to his former north London home and sexually assaulted her. The Mail also reports an allegation from a 19-year-old model who said he tried to kiss her at a party. These are allegations, not findings of fact, and Walliams has denied the claims.
In a statement to The Guardian and ITV News, Walliams said he regretted not always taking the feelings of women with whom he had casual sexual relationships properly into account. He accepted that fame creates a power imbalance, but denied abusing that power. He said he was devastated that some women he had met years earlier had since expressed hurt or anger. The outlets report that his statement had been sent to journalists months before publication; the Mail said he had not issued a further response after his identity became public.
Walliams had sought an injunction at the High Court against The Guardian and ITN, the organisations involved in the investigation, to stop publication. The court rejected the application and reporting restrictions ended on 10 November, allowing him to be named. The first source says his lawyers argued publication could put him at risk of suicide; it reports that the judge found no proper legal basis to restrain publication and that Walliams’s stated intentions were not certain. The first source also links the investigation to HarperCollins’ decision to stop producing his books, reporting that five junior staff members had made harassment allegations. Walliams is best known as a comedian and actor and as the author of bestselling children’s books.
The accounts differ in focus and detail. The first source summarises the investigation’s allegations against 30 women, the court ruling, the publisher’s decision and an ITV News documentary. The Daily Mail’s live coverage concentrates on individual allegations, including the account involving a 15-year-old and another involving a model, and adds details about Walliams’s former home. Those specifics are attributed allegations in the Mail’s reporting; they are not included in the first source’s summary.
Where outlets differ
From the full account, which is AI-written from the sources:
The first source gives a broad overview of allegations by 30 women and adds context about the injunction, HarperCollins and an ITV News documentary. The Daily Mail focuses more closely on specific accounts, including the alleged incident involving a 15-year-old, and describes the location. It also says Walliams had not made a further response after his name was published, while both sources report the substance of his earlier statement to journalists.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The women who came forward have a strong claim that allegations of this seriousness, involving numerous people and spanning many years, merit public scrutiny. Publishing the investigation after a judge found no legal basis to block it can support accountability, inform decisions by readers and employers, and make it easier for others to report misconduct.
The case against
Walliams denies the allegations, and fairness requires distinguishing reported claims from established findings while giving him a meaningful chance to respond. Publicly naming him and ending commercial relationships can have lasting consequences before allegations are tested, so careful reporting and proportionate processes matter alongside transparency.
Explained simply
David Walliams is a British comedian and children’s author, best known for the sketch show Little Britain and books for young readers. He has also worked in television, including as a judge on Britain’s Got Talent.
The allegations concern claims by women about sexual misconduct and harassment, some dating back to the early 2000s. Walliams denies them; separate claims have been made by five junior staff members at publisher HarperCollins. The case has drawn attention to how employers and publishers respond to allegations, and to the legal limits on preventing reporting from being published.
Coverage · 3 sources
Bias meters
From 2 rated sources, 1 unrated.
- Far OutDavid Walliams says he is “not a sexual predator” but admits behaving “thoughtlessly” as sexual misconduct allegations published
- Daily MailRightDavid Walliams live updates: Comedian says 'I am not a sexual predator' as he's named as celebrity who lost injunction bid
- New York PostRightOuted celebrity David Walliams addresses heinous sexual misconduct allegations, admits ‘regret’ about past behavior