Steve Forbes backs Trump’s Mt. Rushmore warning on communism: ‘He’s right’
Steve Forbes, the chairman and editor-in-chief of Forbes and a former Republican presidential candidate, has publicly endorsed President Donald Trump's warning that communism poses a serious internal threat to the United States. Speaking to Fox News Digital, Forbes argued that Trump is right to characterise this internal communist threat as the greatest danger facing America, lending his voice as a long-standing advocate of capitalism to the president's messaging on the issue.
Forbes made the remarks during an interview at Freedom Fest in Las Vegas, where he discussed the state of the American economy and touched on the rise of socialist politics, including in New York City. A prominent champion of free markets and sound money for decades, Forbes ran for the Republican presidential nomination in both 1996 and 2000. His comments align with a broader theme in conservative commentary warning against socialist and Marxist ideas gaining ground in American politics.
- Steve Forbes backs Trump's warning about an internal communist threat.
- Forbes made the comments at Freedom Fest in Las Vegas.
- The Forbes chairman is a veteran advocate of free-market capitalism.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Proponents of the warning argue that Marxist and socialist ideologies are genuinely gaining influence in American education, culture, and politics, particularly among younger generations, and that this represents a long-term ideological threat to the capitalist and individualist foundations of American prosperity. They believe it is both historically prudent and morally necessary to sound clear public warnings against such ideologies before they become further entrenched in institutions.
The case against
Sceptics contend that whilst some left-leaning ideas have gained influence, communism itself remains without meaningful political or institutional power in the United States, and that characterising mainstream progressive policies as communist amounts to rhetorical exaggeration that poisons democratic discourse. They argue that such alarmist framing prevents constructive debate about legitimate policy differences and treats political opponents as existential threats rather than fellow citizens with differing values about collective welfare and individual liberty.