Jill Biden claims Joe would be ‘excoriated’ if he did what’s happening in current White House
Former US First Lady Jill Biden accused the media of applying a "double standard" when covering her husband Joe Biden's presidency compared with how it now covers Donald Trump's administration. She claimed that if Joe Biden had done some of the things currently happening in the White House, he would have been "excoriated" by the press, suggesting reporters are treating Trump more leniently than they treated her husband.
The comments came during an interview in which Jill Biden was questioned by Whoopi Goldberg about whether her husband received fair press coverage during his time in office. The remarks appear as part of wider publicity linked to her husband's forthcoming memoir, amid ongoing debate over how the media has portrayed the Biden and Trump presidencies.
In short
- Jill Biden says media favours Trump over how it treated Joe Biden.
- She claims Joe would be "excoriated" for similar actions.
- Comments made in interview with Whoopi Goldberg.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters of this claim point to documented differences in how media outlets with differing editorial perspectives covered Biden versus Trump, arguing that outlets sympathetic to Biden offered more deferential coverage whilst those sympathetic to Trump were more critical. They contend that identical actions—controversial executive orders, document handling questions, or inflammatory statements—receive markedly different scrutiny depending on which administration commits them, reflecting how partisan media polarisation causes the same standards to shift based on political alignment. This represents a genuine problem affecting public discourse and the ability to evaluate presidencies fairly.
The case against
Critics argue that claims of media double standards often conflate legitimate editorial differences with systematic bias whilst lacking specific, comparable examples of truly identical actions treated differently. They contend that coverage variations reflect substantive circumstances; Trump's administration faced multiple extraordinary crises warranting intense scrutiny, whilst Biden's faced different challenges at different times, making direct comparison difficult. Furthermore, Trump has received substantial critical coverage from major outlets, suggesting claims of lenient treatment are overstated, and without concrete examples, the assertion appears speculative rather than empirically grounded.
Explained simply
Jill Biden is the wife of Joe Biden, who served as US President from 2021 to 2025. She has recently made comments in an interview about how the American media covered her husband's time in office.
Mrs Biden argues that journalists used a "double standard" when comparing coverage of her husband's administration with coverage of Donald Trump, who is now serving as president. She suggests that if her husband had taken certain actions that are currently occurring in the White House, the press would have criticised him far more severely.
This statement touches on an ongoing debate about media consistency in political reporting. The question of whether news outlets apply equal scrutiny to different administrations is regularly discussed and disputed by politicians, journalists and the public.