British 9/11 survivor still grieving loss of sixty-one colleagues

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

·

William Rodriguez, a janitor working two storeys underground in the North Tower, has recounted his experience of the 9/11 attacks and how he came to be described as the last person to escape before the tower collapsed. His story sits alongside that of British survivor Janice Brooks, who has spoken of losing 61 colleagues from Euro Brokers and the guilt she still carries a quarter of a century on, as accounts of the day continue to be told around its anniversary.

Rodriguez describes the chaos in the basement immediately after the first plane struck, including helping a severely burned colleague, Felipe David, to safety and leading terrified temporary staff through the building's tunnels to a loading dock. He says his survival came down to chance, having tried to call in sick that morning before his supervisor insisted he come to work. The wider 9/11 attacks killed 2,977 people after al-Qaeda hijackers flew planes into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania.

Sources
5
Outlets
2
Left · Centre · Right
1 · 0 · 4

In short

  • Janitor William Rodriguez recalls escaping North Tower's collapse on 9/11
  • He helped rescue a badly burned colleague from the basement
  • British survivor Janice Brooks still grieves 61 lost Euro Brokers colleagues

How this story developed

  • 2 months ago Further detail emerged on Brooks's escape, revealing she had initially been turned back into the South Tower by officials before United 175 struck minutes later, with her testimony now framed alongside the broader anniversary coverage of political tributes and veterans' regrets already reported.
  • 2 months ago Attention widened beyond Brooks's account as commemorations unfolded across Britain and the US, with Andy Burnham and Tony Blair stressing the UK-US alliance against terrorism while Afghanistan veterans branded the war a pointless sacrifice and security figures warned lax border controls could repeat past failures.
  • 2 months ago British 9/11 survivor Janice Brooks revealed she has never forgiven herself for attending just 23 of the 61 funerals held for colleagues who died at Euro Brokers when the South Tower was hit, and is preparing to return to New York for the 25th anniversary.
  1. Daily Mail British 9/11 survivor says she will never forgive herself for ‘only’ attending 23 funerals as her ‘heart remains broken’ 25 years later
  2. Daily Mail 25 years after 9/11, New York fire chief who risked his life that day warns of the terrorism dangers of Britain’s ‘idiotic’ migrant open-door policy
  3. The Independent Terror ‘still knocks at door of democracy’, Burnham says on 9/11 25th anniversary
  4. Daily Mail Afghanistan war veterans say their friends ‘died for nothing’ as they speak out 25 years after 9/11
  5. Daily Mail Hero of the North Tower: Astonishing story of brave 9/11 survivor who was last to escape World Trade Center after saving countless people – and the miracles that kept him alive

Where outlets differ

From the full account, which is AI-written from the sources:

The Independent's coverage foregrounds official political tributes (a Downing Street statement, Andy Burnham, Sir Tony Blair) and a message of transatlantic unity and defiance, whereas the other reports focus on personal, eyewitness testimony.

There is an apparent inconsistency in how the political tribute is sourced: a quote attributed to 'the Prime Minister' about UK-US unity appears alongside separately quoted remarks from Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester — the original report does not clearly distinguish which figure said what, so this account attributes the Manchester-specific reflections to Burnham without asserting he holds the office of Prime Minister.

Coverage of Thomas von Essen and Janice Brooks emphasises the human and psychological toll of the day itself — chaos, loss of colleagues, survivor's guilt — rather than politics or policy.

The veterans' account (Ben McBean) is notably more critical in tone, questioning whether the Afghanistan war achieved anything lasting, in contrast to the more solemn, unifying tone of the political tributes.

Casualty figures are reported precisely but differently across stories — nearly 3,000 killed overall with 67 Britons; 2,977 given elsewhere; Janice Brooks's firm alone is said to have lost 61 colleagues — reflecting different sourcing rather than a single agreed figure.

Every side used: door

Headline columns compared word for word; nothing in them is AI-written.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Advocates of the post-9/11 response argue that military intervention in Afghanistan was a necessary and proportionate answer to an attack that killed thousands, aimed at dismantling terrorist safe havens and protecting citizens from further atrocities. They contend that the warnings now being raised about border and immigration vulnerabilities are a prudent continuation of that vigilance, not alarmism, since the conditions that enabled 9/11 arose partly from gaps in intelligence-sharing and entry controls that must not be allowed to re-emerge. For these voices, honouring the dead means maintaining robust security postures rather than allowing complacency to return a quarter-century on.

The case against

Critics, including many who served, argue that two decades of war in Afghanistan produced a costly and ultimately futile campaign, given that the Taliban swiftly reclaimed control once Western forces withdrew, suggesting the sacrifice of lives and resources failed to secure any lasting strategic gain. They caution that framing current border and immigration policy through the lens of preventing another 9/11 risks conflating migration with terrorism, stigmatising vulnerable people and diverting attention from more effective, targeted security measures. For this camp, the anniversary is better marked by honest reckoning with the limits of military intervention than by renewed calls for restrictive controls.

Explained simply

Commemorations across Britain and the United States this week mark 25 years since the 9/11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people when hijacked planes struck the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. The anniversary has brought together survivors, first responders, bereaved families and political leaders, including figures such as Andy Burnham and former Prime Minister Tony Blair, to reflect on the day's impact and the lasting UK-US relationship it shaped.

The attacks triggered a long "war on terror", including the invasion of Afghanistan, which lasted two decades before Western forces withdrew and the Taliban returned to power. That outcome has left many veterans who served there questioning what the campaign achieved, and is a key reason the anniversary carries added weight this year.

The occasion has also become a moment for wider debate about current security and immigration policy, with some former officials drawing links between border controls and the risk of future attacks. These discussions sit alongside the personal, human side of the anniversary, as survivors and responders continue to process grief and loss a quarter of a century on.

Coverage · 5 sources

Bias meters

Left20%
Centre0%
Right80%

From 5 rated sources.

Americas Art Culture Government Horror Politics Travel UK World

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion