Kevin Hart’s 72 Hours struggles to revive bachelor-party comedy
Developed over time first seen 2 months ago
Variety’s review judges Netflix comedy “72 Hours” to be a mediocre, overly frantic generation-gap take on “The Hangover”. Kevin Hart plays Joe, a 40-year-old advertising executive who joins a Miami bachelor party to learn about younger consumers, but the critic argues that the film’s crime storyline overwhelms its comic potential and produces too few laughs.
Directed by Tim Story and written by Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg, the film reunites Hart with his “Ride Along” director and features Mason Gooding alongside “Saturday Night Live” performers Marcello Hernández, Ben Marshall and Kam Patterson. Joe joins the three-day party after a vodka campaign is labelled “cringe” and his promotion is threatened; after taking cocaine at a yacht party, his destructive alter ego leads the group into conflict with a drug lord.
- Variety finds “72 Hours” an unfunny “Hangover” imitation.
- Kevin Hart plays an executive chasing Gen Z insight.
- A crime plot derails the bachelor-party comedy.
New here? Start with this
Kevin Hart is an American comedian and actor known for fast-paced mainstream comedies, including the Ride Along films with director Tim Story. In 72 Hours, he plays Joe, an advertising executive under pressure to understand younger consumers as he tries to protect his career.
The film uses the familiar bachelor-party comedy format, in which a celebratory trip gets increasingly out of control. It also draws comparison with The Hangover, the 2009 comedy about friends facing the consequences of a chaotic night in Las Vegas, while adding a crime storyline to the group’s problems.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The review’s case is that the film relies too heavily on the familiar bachelor-party-disaster formula without finding a sufficiently distinctive comic voice. Its advocates would argue that the escalating crime story distracts from the character comedy, while the frantic piling-on of events leaves too little room for jokes or relationships to land. On this view, Kevin Hart’s energetic performance cannot compensate for a premise that feels derivative and unevenly structured.
The case against
A more favourable reading is that the film deliberately uses an exaggerated, chaotic setup to satirise middle-aged anxieties about staying culturally relevant and to give Hart a broad comic playground. Supporters may see the collision between a corporate executive and a younger bachelor-party group as a serviceable vehicle for fast-paced ensemble comedy, rather than expecting originality on the scale of its obvious predecessors. They could also argue that the criminal subplot raises the stakes in a way that suits the film’s deliberately outlandish tone.
More coverage
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Variety as “’72 Hours’ Review: Kevin Hart Tries to Be Down With the Kids in a Mediocre ‘Hangover’ Knockoff”.