‘Bosch’ Is Making a Mistake Starting a New Era Without Titus Welliver
Collider argues that Bosch: Start of Watch risks weakening the Bosch franchise by launching its new prequel era without Titus Welliver, who played Harry Bosch in both Bosch and Bosch: Legacy. Although the series can explore the detective’s formative years with greater freedom than previous adaptations, the writer believes Welliver’s involvement could have linked the younger character’s experiences to the established version audiences know.
Set in 1991 Los Angeles, the prequel follows 26-year-old rookie Bosch as he confronts racial tensions, gang violence, public distrust of police and a major corruption scandal. The programme is an original story built from details of Bosch’s early life found across Michael Connelly’s novels, rather than a direct adaptation; Bosch ended in 2021 and Bosch: Legacy concluded in 2025.
- Collider says excluding Titus Welliver is a missed opportunity.
- The prequel explores Bosch’s 1991 rookie years.
- It is not directly adapted from a Connelly novel.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Keeping Titus Welliver involved could give the prequel valuable continuity with the acclaimed screen version of Harry Bosch that audiences already recognise. Even a framing device, narration or limited appearance might help connect a younger actor’s interpretation to Bosch’s established moral code and emotional history, while signalling respect for the performance that anchored the franchise. Supporters may see this as especially important when expanding a long-running property into original material rather than directly adapting a novel.
The case against
A prequel set decades earlier has a legitimate reason to establish its own identity, and casting a younger Bosch allows the series to portray an inexperienced officer without asking Welliver to bridge an implausible age gap. Limiting his involvement could also give the new actor and writers room to explore formative events on their own terms, rather than continually measuring them against the familiar older character. Supporters of this approach may value creative renewal and believe the novels’ background details provide sufficient continuity without requiring a returning star.