Brad Pitt Believes His Performance In This 80% RT Movie Had One Major Flaw
Brad Pitt has revealed he remains unhappy with his own performance in Robert Redford's 1992 period drama *A River Runs Through It*, despite the film's acclaim and its status as a career-defining role for him. Speaking to Entertainment Weekly back in 2011, Pitt said he felt he could have done better as troubled Montana reporter Paul Maclean, admitting the pressure of portraying a real person and not wanting to disappoint Redford weighed on him. The remarks highlight a familiar pattern among actors who judge their own work more harshly than critics or audiences do, even years after a project's release.
Despite Pitt's self-criticism, the film is widely regarded as one of Redford's finest directorial achievements and helped establish Pitt as a major star, with critics and fans praising his charismatic yet emotionally reserved portrayal of Paul. Pitt noted he hadn't watched the film in a long time but that his misgivings hadn't changed even after nearly two decades. The article notes Pitt later played a similar character in *Legends of the Fall*, and that *A River Runs Through It* continues to be celebrated as an essential piece of American period cinema, with its influence visible in later works such as Taylor Sheridan's *The Madison*.
- Brad Pitt still thinks he underperformed in 1992's *A River Runs Through It*
- He blamed pressure of playing a real person without disappointing Robert Redford
- Critics widely praised his performance, calling it career-defining