British Museum hosted Palantir founder Peter Thiel in private viewing of Bayeux tapestry
The British Museum privately hosted tech billionaire Peter Thiel for a VIP viewing of the Bayeux tapestry on 18 August, before the exhibition has opened to the public, the Guardian understands. The visit, arranged by the museum's director of development, Charlotte Appleyard, has caused concern among staff given Thiel's links to Jeffrey Epstein and his company Palantir's controversial role in UK government contracts, with worries that scarce "light hours" needed to protect the fragile artwork were used for someone with no known connection to the museum.
Museum chair George Osborne was aware of the viewing but did not attend, and the museum says no light hours were taken from the public allocation and that Thiel is not a donor. Members of the public faced queues of up to nine hours and nearly 80,000 people online when tickets first went on sale, with the next batch released on 21 October; hotel guests at One Aldwych can also bypass the queue. Thiel's Palantir holds a £330m NHS contract that MPs have urged Labour to scrap, and its Metropolitan Police contract was blocked by London mayor Sadiq Khan, a decision Palantir is now challenging in the High Court.
- British Museum gave Peter Thiel a private Bayeux tapestry viewing on 18 August
- Staff concerned over scarce light-hour use and Thiel's Epstein/Palantir links
- Public faced huge queues for tickets; next sale is 21 October
New here? Start with this
The Bayeux tapestry is an embroidered account of the events leading up to the Norman conquest of England in 1066. It is nearly 70 metres long and is considered fragile, so its display and exposure to light must be carefully managed.
Peter Thiel is a US technology investor who co-founded Palantir, a software company that works with governments and other organisations. The British Museum is a publicly funded institution, and its director of development oversees fundraising and relationships with supporters.
Palantir has secured contracts with UK public bodies, including the NHS, while a proposed contract with the Metropolitan Police was blocked by London mayor Sadiq Khan. The tapestry exhibition has drawn strong public interest, with tickets in high demand, making access to the work and decisions about its display matters of public attention.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
A private viewing can be a legitimate part of a museum’s work, allowing it to host influential visitors and build relationships that may support its wider cultural mission. The museum says no public viewing time was used and Thiel is not a donor, so the visit need not have displaced ticket holders or amounted to preferential access bought with a gift.
The case against
Even if no public light hours were lost, giving a wealthy and politically influential visitor access before an exhibition opens can reasonably look like special treatment when ordinary visitors face long queues and scarce tickets. Staff may also question whether the museum’s association with Thiel is appropriate given the reported concerns about his links and Palantir’s government work, and whether the visit served a clear public or institutional purpose.