← Back to the feed

Andy Burnham unveils safeguards against rogue bailiffs and builders

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

The Guardian ·

Andy Burnham has announced tighter safeguards against rogue bailiffs and dishonest building traders in England and Wales, as part of the government’s cost-of-living agenda. The measures aim to protect people in debt from aggressive enforcement and excessive charges, while helping homeowners avoid being exploited by poor-quality or fraudulent builders.

Private bailiffs will need accreditation from the Enforcement Conduct Board, either directly or through their employer, to gain or renew certification, with the full regime expected next year. More than 7 million cases are referred to bailiffs annually and the sector collects over £1bn, mainly for unpaid council tax and traffic-related debts; meanwhile, an Approved Code for home-improvement firms will be fully introduced by December, and Trusted Payments will release building funds in stages linked to project milestones.

  • Bailiffs will face mandatory independent accreditation.
  • New schemes aim to protect homeowners from rogue builders.
  • Full bailiff safeguards are expected next year.

New here? Start with this

Bailiffs are private enforcement agents who collect unpaid debts, such as council tax, parking fines or court-ordered payments. They can visit people’s homes and take certain belongings, but they must follow rules about how they act and what fees they charge.

Concerns have been raised about some bailiffs using intimidating behaviour or adding charges that people find hard to understand. The Enforcement Conduct Board is an independent body set up to improve standards in the industry, including through accreditation and complaints procedures.

Home-improvement scams can involve traders taking money for poor-quality work, failing to finish a job or carrying out unnecessary repairs. Trusted-trader schemes and staged payments are intended to give homeowners clearer information before hiring someone and reduce the risk of paying large sums before work is completed.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters argue that mandatory accreditation and stronger consumer safeguards are a proportionate response to sectors where people may be vulnerable to intimidation, opaque charges or fraud. They say clear standards, trusted-trader checks and protected staged payments can deter bad actors while giving households and debtors practical routes to fair treatment, confidence and redress.

The case against

Critics may argue that additional accreditation, codes and payment processes could raise costs and administrative burdens for legitimate enforcement agents and small building firms, which may then be passed on to customers. They may also question whether new schemes will be effectively enforced, warning that poorly designed rules could restrict lawful debt collection or create a false sense of security without tackling the most determined rogue operators.

More coverage

Business Entertainment Markets TV UK World

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by The Guardian as “Burnham announces crackdown on rogue bailiffs and ‘cowboy builders’”.