← Back to the feed

US disrupts Chinese cyber espionage targeting Senate and agencies

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

Daily Mail ·

The US Justice Department says it disrupted an alleged Chinese state-sponsored cyber espionage operation by seizing two domains used to compromise and obscure access to sensitive networks. The action is significant because the reported targets included major federal agencies, the Senate and critical-infrastructure sectors, highlighting the continuing threat from long-running state-backed hacking.

Prosecutors identified the group as QTFY and said it had operated since at least 2018, serving customers including China’s Ministry of State Security and the People’s Liberation Army. Its QScan tool allegedly infected internet-connected devices, while QTRouter used them to conceal activity; reported victims included the Federal Reserve, NASA, the Senate, health and energy agencies, and unnamed companies in the US and South Korea.

  • US seizes domains linked to alleged Chinese cyber espionage.
  • Reported targets included the Senate, NASA and Federal Reserve.
  • Tools allegedly infected devices and obscured hackers’ origins.

New here? Start with this

Cyber espionage is the use of digital tools to obtain information from another country’s government, businesses or public bodies without permission. States may use specialist groups to seek intelligence, monitor targets or gain access to systems that could be useful in a future crisis.

US authorities say the activity involved companies and people they link to China’s Ministry of State Security, the country’s civilian intelligence agency, and the People’s Liberation Army, China’s military. China has previously rejected similar US allegations of state-backed hacking.

The reported targets include government institutions, health and energy bodies, and critical infrastructure, meaning services and systems important to everyday life and national security. Such operations can be hard to trace because attackers may use compromised internet-connected devices to hide where their activity began.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters argue that seizing infrastructure allegedly used for state-backed espionage is a proportionate defensive step to protect democratic institutions, public agencies and critical services. If the reported evidence is sound, disrupting domains that help conceal intrusions can limit immediate harm without escalating to broader punitive measures. They see this as part of a necessary effort to uphold national security, deter persistent cyber operations and protect sensitive public data.

The case against

Sceptics argue that public attribution and domain seizures should be subject to especially rigorous evidential and legal scrutiny, because cyber activity is technically complex and accusations between major powers can intensify diplomatic tensions. China may regard the claims as politically motivated or insufficiently substantiated, while others may worry about states asserting wide authority over internet infrastructure. From this perspective, long-term security is better served by transparent evidence, clear international rules and channels that reduce the risk of reciprocal escalation.

More coverage

Americas Cybersecurity Government Politics Technology World

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by Daily Mail as “Chilling plot reveals Chinese ‘cyber spies’ hacked top Trump government agencies and the Senate”.

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.