Conwoman duped brothers out of their £76,000 inheritance by selling them fake Rolexes before lying that she had terminal cancer
Stacey Hedges, 40, defrauded two brothers of £76,000 by selling them counterfeit Rolex watches bought with their late mother’s inheritance. She then used fake warranty cards and emails impersonating a jeweller to claim the watches were being repaired, and later falsely said she had terminal cancer.
Hedges admitted three fraud counts at Bournemouth Crown Court and avoided immediate imprisonment because she is the sole carer for her daughter. She spent the money on holidays and household purchases; a separate JustGiving appeal raised £1,390 from 28 donors. The judge said the deception betrayed the brothers’ trust and caused psychological harm to her daughter.
- Two brothers lost £76,000 of their inheritance to fake Rolexes.
- Hedges used forged documents and a false cancer claim to sustain the con.
- She admitted three fraud counts but avoided immediate imprisonment.
New here? Start with this
Stacey Hedges defrauded two brothers of £76,000 by selling them counterfeit Rolex watches using money from their late mother's inheritance. The brothers trusted her to help them invest the family money wisely.
Rather than investing their inheritance, Hedges maintained her fraud by creating fake warranty cards and impersonating a jeweller via email. Her deception expanded further when she falsely claimed to have terminal cancer and launched an online fundraising appeal, collecting money from strangers.
The fraud involved deception at multiple levels, exploiting both people Hedges knew personally and strangers motivated by claims of serious illness. Hedges spent the money on holidays and household items rather than on any charitable cause.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Sentencing law appropriately permits judges to consider the welfare of dependent children when deciding sentences. Removing a sole carer inflicts harm on an innocent child. The judge carefully weighed the victim's harm and the defendant's serious wrongdoing against the real social costs of incarceration and the importance of family stability.
The case against
This systematic fraud—involving forged documents, impersonation, and false cancer claims—was serious and calculated. The victim lost an inheritance from their deceased mother. Whatever mitigation applies to carer status, the severity of the deception warrants more substantial punishment to ensure justice for victims and maintain that serious crimes have serious consequences.