Drivers face being clobbered by tax on workplace parking spaces backed by Andy Burnham, with nearly a dozen town halls drawing up plans to bring in the levy
Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, has backed a proposed tax on workplace parking spaces, with around a dozen town halls understood to be drawing up plans to introduce the levy. The charge would require employers to pay a fee for each parking space they provide to staff, with the cost likely to be passed on to drivers in some form, adding to the financial pressures already facing motorists.
The scheme follows the model pioneered by Nottingham, which has run a workplace parking levy for over a decade, using the revenue to fund public transport improvements including the city's tram network. Supporters argue the tax encourages a shift away from car commuting and raises money for local transport infrastructure, while critics warn it amounts to another burden on drivers and businesses already dealing with high costs.
- Burnham backs workplace parking tax; nearly a dozen councils considering it.
- Levy would charge employers per parking space provided to staff.
- Modelled on Nottingham's existing scheme funding public transport.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters argue that workplace parking levies are a sensible, proven tool for councils facing severe budget pressure, allowing them to raise funds for public transport improvements without resorting to blanket council tax rises. They point to Nottingham's scheme, which has funded tram extensions and rail investment, as evidence that charging employers for parking spaces can ease congestion, cut emissions and encourage commuters onto buses and trains, aligning with wider goals to modernise transport infrastructure and reduce reliance on cars in urban centres.
The case against
Critics argue the levy is effectively a stealth tax that will ultimately be passed on to employees through reduced wages, higher parking charges or job losses, hitting workers who have no realistic alternative to driving, particularly those in areas with poor public transport or working shifts outside normal hours. They contend that businesses already grappling with high costs and economic uncertainty should not face another burden imposed by local authorities, and that such levies risk pushing jobs and investment away from town centres rather than genuinely solving congestion or funding transport improvements.