Every WNBA network’s biggest regular-season audience in 2026 featured Caitlin Clark’s Fever
The Indiana Fever, led by Caitlin Clark, had the most-watched regular-season game on all seven platforms highlighted in the WNBA’s 2026 season report. The figures underline Clark’s role in attracting audiences and give broadcasters a strong reason to feature Indiana, while the league is also seeking to turn interest in the Fever into lasting support for other teams.
Across the league, 51 regular-season broadcasts averaged at least one million viewers, up from 19 in 2025, and nine topped two million, compared with four the previous year. Non-Fever games on ESPN and ABC averaged 984,000 viewers, a 24% rise year on year; ESPN’s average audience across its networks rose from 440,000 in 2023 to 1.2 million in Clark’s rookie season in 2024. The article says the figures do not show how many new viewers came to the league because of Clark.
- The Fever had the top regular-season audience on all seven platforms.
- At least 51 broadcasts averaged one million viewers, up from 19.
- Non-Fever ESPN and ABC audiences rose 24% year on year.
New here? Start with this
The WNBA is the top professional women’s basketball league in the United States. Its regular season is shown across several television and streaming platforms, which compete for viewers and decide which games to feature.
Caitlin Clark is a guard for the Indiana Fever and became a major draw for audiences after joining the league in 2024. The Fever’s visibility matters to broadcasters and to the WNBA, which wants interest in the team to extend to other clubs.
League viewing figures have risen, including for games that do not feature Indiana. Those numbers show the size of audiences, but they do not establish how many people began watching because of Clark.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The figures suggest Caitlin Clark is a major draw, and giving the Fever prominent slots can help broadcasters reach large audiences and bring more attention to the WNBA. That increased exposure may benefit the league as a whole, while the rise in audiences for non-Fever games also offers reason to think interest is spreading beyond Indiana.
The case against
A league whose biggest audiences consistently depend on one team and star could become vulnerable if that appeal fades, and heavy focus on the Fever may leave other teams with less exposure. The reported figures also cannot establish how much of the audience growth Clark caused, so treating her as the main explanation risks overlooking broader changes in interest or the contributions of other players and teams.