Football Daily | Italy’s search for a manager turns into a shemozzle of epic proportions
Italy's search for a new national team manager has descended into chaos, with the Italian Football Federation cycling through candidates before settling on former boss Roberto Mancini as the likely favourite. This matters because the Azzurri have missed the last three men's World Cups and remain without a permanent coach as they attempt to rebuild, highlighting deeper dysfunction within Italian football's leadership just as their rivals appear settled and stable by comparison.
Pep Guardiola turned down the role to take a year off, before talks with Andrea Pirlo collapsed reportedly over backlash against his autobiography and its links to a Russian betting company; the appointment was said to have been vetoed by the federation president, prompting technical director Paolo Maldini and adviser Leonardo to resign only three weeks into their posts. Mancini, who won Euro 2020 with Italy, and Antonio Conte, who reached the Euro 2016 quarter-finals, are now the leading contenders. The contrast is stark with France, where Zinedine Zidane has been confirmed as Didier Deschamps' successor after 14 stable years under the outgoing coach, with Zidane calling the move "a continuity, a dream".
- Italy's manager hunt collapses after Guardiola and Pirlo both fall through
- Maldini and Leonardo quit federation roles after just three weeks
- Mancini and Conte now favourites; contrasts with France's smooth Zidane switch
New here? Start with this
Italy is searching for a new head coach for its national men's football team following failure to qualify for the last three World Cups. Finding a suitable manager is seen as essential to rebuilding the team.
The federation has approached prominent managers, including some with previous success in Italian football, but disagreements within the federation have complicated the search. Some candidates have declined the position whilst others have seen their appointments blocked by disputes. These conflicts prompted senior officials to resign, revealing problems with how decisions are being made.
The situation contrasts with other top football nations, where succession planning for a new coach tends to be more straightforward. France, for example, has arranged a succession plan after years of stable management. The difference illustrates broader issues with how Italian football's leadership operates.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The Federation correctly prioritised integrity over speed by rejecting candidates with problematic associations, particularly Pirlo given his autobiography's links to Russian betting companies. Such selectivity is justified when restoring a struggling national programme; appointing the wrong manager would compound Italy's difficulties far more than a period of careful deliberation. Standards matter more than convenience when rebuilding institutional credibility.
The case against
The chaotic process—multiple failed candidacies and the unexpected departures of respected figures Maldini and Leonardo within weeks—reveals systemic leadership failures rather than principled selectivity. France's orderly transition to Zidane demonstrates that careful vetting and efficient management are compatible; the Federation's inability to achieve both suggests serious organisational dysfunction. The resulting uncertainty and internal disruption themselves constitute damage to institutional confidence and team preparation.