← Back to the feed

Infantino faces scrutiny over World Cup plans and Fifa governance

The Guardian ·

Gianni Infantino is expected to face sharp questions from Fifa council members at a meeting in Zurich about a proposed World Cup sell-off, the Folarin Balogun affair and Fifa’s decision to give Donald Trump its inaugural peace prize. Critics, including the leaders of Uefa, Concacaf and the Asian Football Confederation, will press for an independent review of Fifa’s governance.

Infantino has promised an external review, but its details have not been announced and critics doubt whether it will be independent. He is also likely to be asked about reports that a Fifa subsidiary paid him about £1.3m in 2024 on top of the £3.9m listed in Fifa’s accounts; Fifa denies paying a second salary and says its compensation disclosures comply with the rules. Despite the disputes, Infantino is currently on course to stand unopposed for re-election in March, with candidate declarations due by 18 November.

  • Infantino faces questions over several Fifa controversies.
  • Critics want an independent review of Fifa’s governance.
  • He remains on course for an unopposed re-election.

New here? Start with this

Fifa is the organisation that runs international football and stages the men’s and women’s World Cups. Its council helps oversee the organisation, while Gianni Infantino, its president since 2016, leads it. Uefa, Concacaf and the Asian Football Confederation are regional football bodies whose leaders are among Fifa’s senior members.

Fifa’s governance covers how it makes decisions, manages money and accounts for its actions. The issues drawing attention include proposals linked to the World Cup, a dispute involving US player Folarin Balogun, the award of a peace prize to Donald Trump, and questions about Infantino’s pay. The debate matters because Fifa’s decisions affect national football bodies, players and supporters around the world.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters of Infantino could argue that Fifa’s proposed World Cup plans and prize decisions are within its leadership’s remit, and that an external review can address concerns while allowing the organisation to keep operating. Fifa says it has not paid Infantino a second salary and that its disclosures follow the rules; his likely uncontested re-election may also suggest that no rival has secured sufficient support.

The case against

Critics could argue that the World Cup sell-off, the Balogun affair, the peace prize and questions about Infantino’s compensation warrant independent scrutiny because they raise concerns about decision-making and accountability. They may doubt whether a review commissioned by Fifa will be genuinely independent, and contend that unopposed re-election does not resolve those concerns or demonstrate broad confidence in the process.

Football Geopolitics Politics Sport

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by The Guardian as “Gianni Infantino faces grilling at potentially ‘explosive’ Fifa council meeting”.

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.