Grindr pays £26m to settle UK lawsuit over allegedly sharing users’ HIV status
Developed over time first seen 2 months ago
Grindr has agreed to pay £26m to settle a UK High Court lawsuit brought by around 12,000 users who alleged the dating app shared highly sensitive personal data, including in some cases their HIV status, with advertising companies without proper consent. The case, filed in April 2024 by London law firm Austen Hays over alleged breaches of UK privacy law, concerned Grindr's practices up to early 2020, when it was owned by China's Beijing Kunlun Tech, and forms part of a wider pattern of regulatory and legal action against the app over its historical handling of users' private data.
Under the settlement, Grindr will pay £13m by the end of this year and a further £13m by March 2027, giving affected users an average of £2,167 each if divided equally; the company denies liability and says no findings were made against it. Grindr, now valued at $2.65bn with nearly 15 million users worldwide, says it overhauled its privacy practices after 2020, when it was sold to US investors amid national security concerns and later listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The settlement echoes a separate case in Norway, where regulators fined Grindr £4.8m in 2021 for similar data-sharing violations, a decision upheld on appeal last October.
- Sources
- 2
- Outlets
- 2
- Left · Centre · Right
- 1 · 1 · 0
In short
- Grindr to pay £26m over alleged sharing of users' HIV status with advertisers
- Settles UK High Court claim by 12,000 users; no admission of liability
- Echoes Norway's 2021 £4.8m fine for similar pre-2020 data practices
How this story developed
- 2 months ago Grindr has agreed to pay £26m to settle a UK high court lawsuit brought by around 12,000 users who alleged the dating app shared highly sensitive personal data, including in some cases their HIV status, with advertising companies.
- 2 months ago Grindr will pay £26m to settle a UK lawsuit brought by thousands of users who alleged the dating app shared highly sensitive personal data, including in some cases their HIV status, with advertising companies.
- 2 months ago Grindr has agreed to pay £26m to settle a UK High Court lawsuit brought by around 12,000 users who alleged the dating app shared highly sensitive personal data, including in some cases their HIV status, with advertising companies without proper consent.
Full account
Grindr has agreed to pay £26m to settle a group legal action brought by thousands of UK users who alleged the dating app shared highly sensitive personal data, including in some instances their HIV status, with third-party advertising and analytics firms. The settlement closes a case that had been running since April 2024, when the London law firm Austen Hays lodged a claim at the High Court of England and Wales on behalf of Grindr users, arguing that the company had breached UK privacy law over data practices dating back to before 2020.
Reports differ slightly on the exact number of claimants involved: one account puts the figure at around 12,000 people represented by the law firm, while another cites more than 11,000 signed-up claimants once the action was also served in the US. If the £26m is divided evenly, each claimant would receive roughly £2,167. Under the terms disclosed in a filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Grindr will pay £13m by the end of this year and a further £13m by 31 March 2027. The company said the settlement, reached on 2 September, involves no admission or finding of liability.
The underlying allegations stem from revelations first reported in 2018 that Grindr had passed users' personal data, including HIV status, to two data analytics companies, Apptimize and Localytics, ostensibly to help tailor advertising. The claim brought by Austen Hays also referenced data on users' ethnicity and sexual orientation, and argued that a potentially unlimited number of third parties could have accessed such material. Grindr, which lets users voluntarily disclose their HIV status and last test date as a way of reducing stigma and aiding informed choices, stopped sharing that information with the two firms in April 2018 after Norwegian researchers exposed the practice. Norway's data protection authority later fined the company the equivalent of roughly £4.8m to £5.5m, and the UK's Information Commissioner's Office issued a reprimand in 2022.
Grindr has repeatedly stressed that the conduct at issue relates to a period before 2020, when it was owned by the Chinese gaming firm Beijing Kunlun Tech. Concerns among US national security officials about Chinese access to American users' data prompted Kunlun to sell the company to the investment group San Vicente Acquisition for $608m in 2020, after which new management took over. Grindr floated on the New York Stock Exchange in 2022 via a merger with a special purpose acquisition company, and is now valued at around $2.65bn (£1.96bn). The company said it has since overhauled its privacy programme and remains committed to being 'a safe space' for its community, while Chaya Hanoomanjee, the lawyer who led the claim, said in 2024 that affected users had suffered significant distress and that Grindr owed it to the LGBTQ+ community to compensate those whose data had been compromised.
Where outlets differ
From the full account, which is AI-written from the sources:
The Guardian gives the claimant total as roughly 12,000 people represented by Austen Hays, while the BBC cites 'more than 11,000' claimants and notes the action was also served in the US courts.
The BBC includes more detail on the specific third parties named in the claim (Apptimize and Localytics) and on Grindr's stated rationale for allowing users to share HIV status voluntarily, framing it as a stigma-reduction feature.
The Guardian provides more corporate/financial background — the 2020 sale to San Vicente Acquisition amid US national-security concerns, the 2022 SPAC listing and current valuation — while the BBC focuses more tightly on the legal claim's details and quotes the claimants' lawyer directly.
Figures for the Norway fine differ slightly between sources (£4.8m in the Guardian's account versus £5.5m in the BBC's), likely reflecting different currency conversion dates or reporting of the original krone figure.
Left-leaning outlets 1
Only here: pays, lawsuit, sharing
Centre outlets 1
Only here: claims, shared
Every side used: grindr, settle, allegedly, users, status
Headline columns compared word for word; nothing in them is AI-written.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Advocates for the claimants argue that sharing users' HIV status and sexual orientation data with advertisers was an egregious breach of trust, given the potentially serious consequences of such information being exposed, including discrimination and stigma. They see the size of the settlement, coming after a similar Norwegian ruling, as a necessary and proportionate signal that intimate health data cannot be treated as an ordinary commercial commodity. For them, robust financial penalties are essential to incentivise genuinely stronger privacy protections, particularly on platforms serving communities who have historically faced discrimination.
The case against
Grindr and those sympathetic to its position note that the practices in question date from 2020, reflected then-common advertising-industry norms rather than any deliberate targeting of vulnerable users, and were never the subject of an admission of liability. They point to the company's stated overhaul of its privacy practices since then as evidence the underlying issue has already been addressed, making settlement a pragmatic way to end lengthy, costly litigation rather than proof of wrongdoing. Some may also observe that with an average payout of roughly £2,167 per claimant, cases like this can be shaped as much by litigation economics and collective-action fee structures as by demonstrated individual harm.
Explained simply
Grindr is a dating and social networking app aimed primarily at gay, bisexual and transgender users, and it has long asked users to voluntarily share personal details on their profiles, including their HIV status. The core issue in this case is that, around 2020, that kind of highly sensitive health data was allegedly passed on to third-party advertising firms without users' proper knowledge or consent, which would breach UK data protection rules designed to give people control over such information.
The legal action was brought in the UK's high court by roughly 12,000 Grindr users, organised through the law firm Austen Hays, against the app's then-owner, the Chinese company Beijing Kunlun Tech. Grindr has since been sold and is now a separate, publicly valued company that says it has changed how it handles user data since the period in question.
This matters because it is one of the largest settlements of its kind over dating-app privacy in the UK, and it follows a similar ruling against Grindr in Norway, highlighting wider concerns about how apps handling intimate personal data, including health status, protect that information from being used for advertising purposes.
Coverage · 2 sources
Bias meters
From 2 rated sources.
Americas Business Cybersecurity Software Technology UK World