Halo: Campaign Evolved review

← Back to the feed

Halo: Campaign Evolved review

Developing story first seen 2 hours ago

Eurogamer · 2 hours ago

Eurogamer's review of Halo: Campaign Evolved, Halo Studios' remake of the original 2001 game, finds it a curiously enjoyable reinvention rather than a faithful reproduction, and argues that this is largely to its credit. The reviewer likens Halo Studios' task to Master Chief's own predicament in the game, treading carefully on the legacy of Bungie's masterwork despite hostile conditions, including scepticism from some original developers, yet largely succeeding in recapturing the thrill of playing the original for the first time.

The remake adds modern mechanics such as aiming down sights (though taking damage still descopes the player), sprinting, extra vehicles and weapons, and dozens of skull modifiers, while reworking later levels to cut tedium. The reviewer credits the series' own evolution across sequels for making these additions feel natural rather than a betrayal of the original. Criticisms include only modest improvements to the repetitive, backtracking-heavy Flood missions late in the campaign, and new wayfinding aids in levels like The Library and Assault on the Control Room that are seen as slightly patronising, undercutting some of the original's sense of scale and mystery.

  • Halo: Campaign Evolved reimagines the 2001 classic rather than just remaking it
  • Adds sprinting, ADS aiming, more vehicles, weapons and skull modifiers
  • Flood missions improved slightly; new wayfinding aids feel unnecessary

More coverage

Gaming

Read the full article at the source →