Houthis claim attack on Saudi capital after smoke seen rising near Riyadh airport

← Back to the feed

Houthis claim attack on Saudi capital after smoke seen rising near Riyadh airport

Developed over time first seen 2 days ago

BBC World · 2 days ago

Iran-backed Houthi militants launched coordinated attacks on Saudi Arabia's capital Riyadh and Red Sea energy facilities on Saturday, marking an escalation in their conflict with the Saudi-backed government in Yemen. Black smoke rose from Aramco fuel tanks near Riyadh's international airport, with explosions heard across the city and flights temporarily disrupted, prompting the first air raid alerts in the capital since the Houthis intensified their campaign in July. The US State Department urged Americans in the Middle East to reconsider travel, citing concerns that the military conflict could escalate rapidly and disrupt regional energy supplies.

The Houthis claimed to have deployed "a large number of ballistic and cruise missiles and drones" targeting sensitive sites in Riyadh and Aramco facilities, saying the strikes were retaliation for Saudi attacks on the Yemeni capital Sanaa, which they control. Saudi authorities confirmed intercepting one ballistic missile but provided no details of additional damage or casualties. Fighting between the Houthis and Saudi-backed government forces on Saturday claimed 48 lives, with over 104,796 people displaced by recent conflict. The Houthis, locked in a civil war with Yemen's internationally recognised government, have also recently seized strategic territory including the port city of Mokha and Perim Island, establishing a naval blockade that threatens key shipping routes used for exports to Asia and Europe.

  • Houthis attacked Riyadh and Saudi energy sites with missiles and drones
  • US warns Americans to reconsider travel; conflict threatens rapid escalation
  • Blockade of key shipping routes threatens regional energy and trade flows

New here? Start with this

The Houthis are a rebel group based in Yemen, a country in the southern Arabian Peninsula. They have been engaged in a long-running conflict with Saudi Arabia and a Saudi-led military coalition supporting the Yemeni government. The conflict has lasted years and involves repeated airstrikes and military operations.

Saudi Arabia and its allies have conducted extensive military operations against the Houthis, citing concerns about regional security and alleged links between the group and Iran. The Houthis say they are defending Yemen against foreign intervention and have responded with attacks including drone and missile strikes aimed at targets in Saudi Arabia. This cycle of retaliation has continued for years.

These attacks matter because Saudi Arabia is a major oil producer and key regional power, and disruptions to its infrastructure could affect global energy supplies and regional stability. The conflict has also had severe humanitarian consequences for Yemen's civilian population, with years of fighting causing widespread displacement and casualties. Escalations like these latest attacks raise concerns that the conflict could intensify further and spread beyond Yemen's borders.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

The Houthis frame their strikes as a justified response to a vastly more powerful military campaign conducted by the Saudi-led coalition, which reportedly carried out 300 strikes in Yemen in a single week and caused tens of thousands of displacements. They contend that targeting military and strategic infrastructure—rather than civilian populations—constitutes legitimate resistance against what they characterize as foreign aggression. From this perspective, they are defending their territory against asymmetrical military pressure and retaliation is a rational exercise of self-defence.

The case against

Strikes against commercial airports and energy infrastructure represent a dangerous escalation that threatens civilians and regional stability regardless of preceding grievances. Such attacks breach the principle of distinction between military and civilian targets, which underpins international humanitarian law, and endanger the movement of innocent people and the region's energy security. Even if the Houthis' grievances merit serious consideration, responding through attacks on civilian-serving infrastructure perpetuates cycles of violence and sets precedents that destabilise the broader region.

More coverage

Culture Middle East Travel World

Read the full article at the source →