Huge PS5 sale lets you stock up on physical discs before they disappear forever

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Those favouring physical media ownership argue that tangible copies provide genuine consumer rights—the ability to resell, gift, or preserve games indefinitely without dependence on corporate servers or evolving terms of service. As physical releases disappear, they become increasingly valuable insurance against digital delisting and server closures, risks already realised across various platforms. Physical ownership represents a consumer choice that preserves liberty and long-term access.

The case against

Those supporting the shift toward digital distribution contend it represents inevitable technological progress with substantial benefits: reduced manufacturing waste, lower costs that benefit consumers, and streamlined operations enabling creators to retain greater control and gather clearer market data. Digital delivery is more convenient and accessible for most players, and concerns about access loss are overstated given the industry's genuine investment in long-term preservation and the practical implausibility of major titles becoming unavailable.