New releases, music videos and album news — indie, rap, rock and pop. Always covering Ren, Chris Webby, Sam Tompkins, bbno$, CHINCHILLA, Muse, Yungblud and more.
Judge Torn on Lil Durk Bail Question After Murder-for-Hire Verdict: ‘A Question of Psychology’
A judge is weighing whether to release rapper Lil Durk on bail after a jury acquitted him of murder-for-hire, while he awaits a separate racketeering trial. The decision turns on whether the acquittal changes the risk that he might flee, given his earlier attempt to travel to Dubai before his 2024 arrest.
Durk’s lawyers have offered all his future music royalties as bond and cited support letters from Jay-Z and J. Cole; prosecutors argue he could flee abroad and continue earning money. He has been jailed for more than two years and still faces a trial next summer over allegations that he used his label, Only the Family, to organise gang violence. The judge has taken the bail request under submission and will issue a written ruling.
In short
- Lil Durk was acquitted of murder-for-hire.
- A judge is considering his release on bail.
- He still faces a racketeering trial next summer.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The acquittal removes one serious charge and may weaken the case for continued detention, while a substantial bond backed by future royalties could give Durk a strong reason to return to court. His lawyers may also argue that lengthy pre-trial imprisonment is a heavy cost when the separate allegations remain untried.
The case against
The acquittal does not resolve the separate racketeering case or necessarily change the risks relevant to bail. Prosecutors can argue that his earlier attempt to travel to Dubai, financial means and ability to earn abroad make flight a genuine concern that a royalties bond may not adequately address.