Kamala Harris faces Democratic doubts over 2028 as allies push back on claims she’s squandered her chance
Kamala Harris is facing doubts from some Democratic donors and strategists about whether she has done enough since losing the 2024 election to reshape her political image ahead of a possible 2028 presidential run. Her adviser Maria Cardona has rejected that criticism, arguing Harris is advancing new ideas and concentrating on helping Democrats in the midterm elections.
Critics interviewed for a report based on nearly 20 California donors and strategists said Harris had not distinguished herself from her previous campaign. Cardona cited proposals including expanding the Supreme Court, lowering the voting age to 16, and making Washington, DC and Puerto Rico states; she also pointed to Harris’s appearances around the country and comments urging Black voters to be more transactional. Harris has campaigned with some Democratic candidates, while others in red states have asked her not to join them. A 2028 bid would bring high name recognition but likely face a crowded primary and a party seeking to move on from 2024.
- Democrats are divided over Harris’s prospects for 2028.
- Adviser Maria Cardona says Harris has put forward new proposals.
- A possible campaign would face a crowded primary and 2024 doubts.
New here? Start with this
Kamala Harris was the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in 2024, after serving as vice-president under Joe Biden. She lost the election to Republican Donald Trump. US presidential candidates are chosen through party contests, known as primaries, before the national election.
Democrats will next choose a presidential candidate for the 2028 election. Harris could seek the nomination, but other candidates may also run, and party members differ over what direction the party should take after 2024. The debate matters because Harris’s prominence could help her campaign, while her record and public profile may shape how voters and party supporters assess her.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Critics can argue that a potential 2028 candidate needs to show how she has grown since a major defeat, and that Harris’s visibility and familiar policy proposals have not yet given voters a clearer sense of what she would do differently. With a crowded primary likely, doubts about her appeal beyond existing supporters and mixed signals from candidates about campaigning with her are relevant tests of her prospects.
The case against
Harris’s allies can argue that one year out from an election loss is too soon to judge her next chapter, especially while she is helping Democratic candidates and developing policy ideas. Her national profile gives her a platform to shape debate, and proposals such as voting-age reform and changes to the Supreme Court can be seen as substantive positions rather than evidence that she has failed to evolve.