Heathrow runway support puts pressure on Burnham as investors seek clarity
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has backed a third runway at Heathrow, arguing it could support jobs, investment and economic growth across the UK. Her comments sharpen questions about Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s position: he has not confirmed support for the scheme, which he opposed as Greater Manchester mayor.
Heathrow chief executive Thomas Woldbye says investors may withdraw if the Government does not give a clear signal by January, when the airport is reportedly due to decide whether to submit a planning application. The Government says growth matters but that the proposal must pass tests on climate, noise and air quality; it also notes there is no live planning application. Alexander argues airport expansion can be compatible with climate goals.
- Heidi Alexander supports a third Heathrow runway.
- Burnham has yet to confirm his position.
- Heathrow investors may reconsider by January.
New here? Start with this
Heathrow is the UK’s busiest airport, and a third runway would allow it to handle more flights. The proposal has been debated for years because supporters say it could bring jobs and investment, while critics have raised concerns about emissions, noise and air quality.
The Government must weigh the possible economic benefits against its environmental commitments and the effects on people living near the airport. A planning application would need to be assessed against those requirements before any decision on construction.
Heidi Alexander is the Transport Secretary, while Andy Burnham is Prime Minister; Burnham opposed the runway when he was mayor of Greater Manchester. Heathrow chief executive Thomas Woldbye represents the airport, whose plans depend on investors and Government decisions.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters argue that a third runway could create jobs, attract investment and improve the UK’s capacity for trade and travel, with benefits extending beyond London. They say expansion can be compatible with climate commitments if it meets strict tests on emissions, noise and air quality, and that investors need a clear policy signal to make long-term decisions.
The case against
Opponents argue that expanding Heathrow could increase emissions and worsen noise and air pollution for nearby communities, making climate and quality-of-life goals harder to meet. They say those costs should not be set aside for projected economic gains, and that the Government should require convincing evidence that the scheme meets its environmental tests before signalling support.
Business Culture Economy Fashion UK World
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Daily Mail as “Labour at war over Heathrow’s £33billion third runway as Transport Secretary warns ‘Britain loses by standing still’ – as Burnham is accused of dithering over backing”.