Liberal-city resident hesitates when pressed on beliefs: ‘I hadn’t really thought about socialism that way’
Residents interviewed in Portland, Maine, gave contrasting views on socialism, a topic prominent in this year’s US midterm campaign coverage. Their answers showed that some support its aim of reducing inequality and meeting people’s needs, while questioning or rejecting greater government control of businesses and property.
A Fox News poll found 32% of voters viewed socialism favourably and 64% unfavourably, with the favourable figure matching a record high for that poll. Gallup reported a 43% positive view, its highest since tracking began in 2010. Interviewees differed on how socialism relates to private ownership: some favoured stronger support for disadvantaged people and small businesses, while others warned it could give government too much power.
- Portland residents disagreed on what socialism means.
- Polls show favourable views at record or near-record highs.
- Support for equality did not always extend to public ownership.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters argue that a society should ensure people can meet basic needs and reduce entrenched inequality, especially when markets leave disadvantaged people behind. They may see stronger public provision or support for workers and small businesses as a way to spread opportunity while still allowing private ownership.
The case against
Critics argue that expanding government control over businesses and property can concentrate power in the state, weaken individual choice and discourage investment or enterprise. They may support helping people in need while favouring private ownership and market-led activity as more reliable ways to create prosperity.