Linux kernel drops AI-contribution disclosure rule, as Linus Torvalds says banning the tech would be ‘utterly stupid’
The Linux kernel has removed a proposed rule that would have required contributors to disclose when they used artificial intelligence to help write code. The change reflects a preference for reviewing contributions on their technical merits, while keeping AI use permitted.
Linus Torvalds said banning AI tools outright would be “utterly stupid”, arguing that they can be useful when applied appropriately. The article presents the policy shift as part of the kernel project’s effort to respond to AI-assisted development without imposing a disclosure requirement.
- The Linux kernel dropped its proposed AI disclosure rule.
- Linus Torvalds opposes banning AI tools outright.
- Contributions will be assessed on their technical merits.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Removing mandatory disclosure can keep review focused on whether code is correct, secure and maintainable, rather than on which tools helped produce it. Since contributors remain responsible for their submissions, this approach may avoid an administrative rule that is difficult to apply consistently while allowing useful tools to improve development.
The case against
Disclosure can help maintainers understand how code was produced and decide whether additional scrutiny is needed, especially where contributors may not fully recognise errors or provenance issues in AI-generated work. A clear reporting requirement could support accountability and trust, while still permitting AI assistance rather than banning it.