Male Lindsay Clancy juror breaks silence to describe moment he pressed lone holdout and how it led to mistrial
A male juror from the Lindsay Clancy murder trial has spoken publicly for the first time about how he confronted a lone holdout on the jury, whose refusal to acquit led Judge William Sullivan to declare a mistrial. Clancy, 36, admitted to strangling her three children with exercise bands but argued she was suffering a drug-induced psychosis brought on by overmedication for postpartum depression, and eleven of the twelve jurors ultimately agreed she was not guilty by reason of insanity, leaving the case unresolved and the possibility of a retrial hanging over the former labour and delivery nurse.
Nick Dargie, 25, told ABC News he repeatedly pressed the dissenting juror to justify his position with evidence or witness testimony but said the man never could, prompting the panel to send a note to the judge that led to the mistrial being declared at Plymouth Superior Court. His account echoed that of jury foreperson Roni Carlson and other female jurors, who said the holdout would not engage in discussion despite admitting he had reasonable doubt. The jury, comprising nine women and three men, deliberated for more than 37 hours over the deaths of five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson and eight-month-old Callan in January 2023, before deliberations collapsed and an emergency motion to force further talks failed.
- Juror says holdout gave no evidence to back his not-guilty refusal
- Deliberations lasted 37+ hours before judge declared mistrial
- Lindsay Clancy could now face a retrial over her children's deaths