← Back to the feed

Mountain of broken fridges growing across England and Wales

BBC Science ·

A backlog of broken fridges and freezers is building up at waste sites across England and Wales after heat waves increased appliance failures and reduced recycling capacity. The Local Government Association says dozens of councils have suspended white-goods collections, leaving residents unable to dispose of appliances safely and raising concerns about environmental risks from refrigerant gases.

Twenty-six councils, including Bradford, Gloucestershire, Durham and Nottingham, halted fridge collections this month. Three of the UK’s 10 full-scale fridge-processing plants have closed in the past year, while remaining sites cannot operate above 30°C; appliances are therefore being exported to Europe as a temporary measure. The industry expects recovery to take six to 12 months, and the LGA wants manufacturers to contribute more towards collection, storage and new processing capacity.

  • Fridge recycling capacity has fallen sharply across England and Wales.
  • Heat waves increased breakdowns while limiting processing plants.
  • Councils and industry expect disruption for up to a year.

New here? Start with this

Fridges and freezers need specialist treatment when they stop working because they contain gases and materials that can harm the environment if released. Councils usually collect them separately from other household rubbish and send them to licensed sites, where the gases are removed and parts such as metal and plastic can be recycled.

Local councils are responsible for arranging many household waste services, but they rely on private firms and specialist plants to process large appliances. There are only a limited number of facilities able to handle old fridges and freezers in the UK, so closures or interruptions can quickly create a backlog at collection points and storage sites.

Heat waves can both increase demand for appliance repairs or replacements and make some industrial processes harder to run safely. The situation has also renewed discussion over who should pay for the cost of dealing with products once they reach the end of their life, including manufacturers, retailers, councils and households.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Manufacturers should contribute more because their products create the waste and councils are struggling to collect and store fridges safely as processing capacity falls short. Shared funding could help expand recycling facilities, reduce environmental risks from refrigerants and make the system more resilient to heat-related disruption.

The case against

Requiring manufacturers to pay more could raise appliance prices and place extra costs on businesses, including those already funding waste schemes. Councils and government also shape collection and recycling services, so a fair response could spread responsibility across the whole system and focus on restoring capacity without assuming manufacturers alone should bear the bill.

Business Cricket Markets Science Sport UK World

Read the full article at the source →

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.