Clubbers debate how chatter, phones and drugs are changing dancefloors
DJs and clubbers are arguing over whether conversation, phones and drug use are changing the dancefloor and making it harder to dance. The debate matters because clubs are meant to offer both shared musical experiences and social connection, but some say those aims are increasingly at odds.
DJ Jane Fitz’s request for less chatting at sets prompted strong reactions, while DJ James Ronald argued that talking is part of club community. Other concerns include people filming or standing still, ketamine and cocaine shaping behaviour, high ticket costs keeping younger dancers away, crowded venues with few quiet spaces, and licensing rules that can make music quieter.
In short
- Jane Fitz’s plea for less dancefloor chatter sparked debate.
- Some clubbers see conversation as part of community.
- Phones, drugs, costs and crowded venues also shape dancing.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Those who want quieter, less phone-centred dancefloors argue that sustained conversation, filming and standing still can distract from the music and make it harder for others to dance. They may see a shared focus on the set as part of what makes clubbing distinctive, and worry that drug-related behaviour, crowding and commercial pressures are weakening that experience.
The case against
Those who welcome conversation and socialising argue that clubs are communal spaces, where meeting people and talking are part of the experience rather than a breach of it. They may also point to high prices, crowded venues, limited quiet areas and licensing restrictions as wider reasons dancefloors feel different, and favour making clubs more accessible and comfortable over expecting everyone to behave in one prescribed way.
Explained simply
Clubs bring people together to listen and dance to music, but they are also places to meet and talk. DJs and clubbers can differ over how much conversation fits the shared experience of a set.
The debate involves DJs, including Jane Fitz and James Ronald, as well as the people who attend their sets. It also touches on phone use, drugs, ticket prices, crowded rooms and rules on music volume, all of which can affect how people experience a night out.
These questions matter because clubs depend on both music and social connection. What happens on the dancefloor can influence who feels welcome and whether people can enjoy dancing together.
Art Culture Health Medicine Space Technology Trending Weird & Viral
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “Murder on the dancefloor: are phones, drugs and chatter killing off dancing?”.