← Back to the feed

New Xbox Labs Team Officially Announced

Polygon ·

Microsoft has announced Xbox Labs, a small team exploring new ways for players and developers to create, adapt and access games. The move follows a wave of experimental projects that have modified games or brought them to unexpected hardware, and signals a willingness to explore AI-assisted development while gaming companies rethink how games are made.

Led by Xbox chief technology officer Scott Van Vliet, the team will test ideas in public and judge success by whether more people play and create. CEO Asha Sharma cited examples including browser-based Halo: Combat Evolved with 128-player multiplayer and Bloodborne running on PC; she said Xbox’s existing priorities remain in place. The announcement follows Sharma’s February warning against flooding Xbox with “soulless AI slop” and comes a day after Epic said it was embracing AI-accelerated development.

  • Xbox has created a team to explore new gaming ideas and tools.
  • The announcement follows experimental game ports and remixes.
  • Asha Sharma says Xbox’s core priorities remain unchanged.

New here? Start with this

Microsoft is the company behind Xbox, a gaming brand that includes consoles, games and services. Its teams work on both the technology used to make games and the ways people play them.

Xbox Labs is intended to explore ways to help players and developers create, change and access games. Its work sits amid wider experimentation in gaming, including adapting existing games for new formats and considering how AI tools might affect development.

Scott Van Vliet is Xbox’s chief technology officer, while Asha Sharma is Microsoft’s chief executive. The subject matters to players and game makers because new tools and ways of playing could affect who can create games and how audiences reach them.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

An experimental Xbox Labs team could help developers try new tools and formats, lower barriers to creating games, and make existing titles accessible in unexpected ways. Testing ideas publicly and judging them by whether more people play and create may let Xbox learn what is useful while keeping its stated priorities in place.

The case against

A dedicated team exploring AI-assisted development could still encourage rapid experimentation before its effects on creative quality, working practices or players are well understood. Given concerns about generic AI-generated content, sceptics may question whether broadening access and output will lead to more worthwhile games, and whether public experiments will stay aligned with Xbox’s existing priorities.

Americas Business Companies Entertainment Gaming Research Science

Read the full article at the source →

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.