World news and discussion on TalkFuse.
OnePlus never had a chance in the US
OnePlus has announced it is exiting the United States market, twelve years after launching its debut phone there in 2014. The move comes despite the brand's recent resurgence with well-reviewed devices such as the OnePlus 15 and OnePlus Open, and highlights how the company's cult-favourite, direct-to-consumer approach never translated into a workable model within America's carrier-dominated phone market.
The decline had been building for years: T-Mobile dropped OnePlus's flagship phones after 2022, keeping only the budget Nord line, while Verizon's partnership lasted just two years, from 2020 to 2021. OnePlus first reached a US carrier in 2018, by which point T-Mobile said nearly 200,000 customers were already using its phones on the network, though this remained far below Samsung and Apple, which accounted for around 90% of carrier phone sales in 2020. The article argues OnePlus's "flagship killer" pitch of high specs at low upfront cost was undermined by America's bill-credit purchasing model, which spreads the true cost of even premium phones over 24 to 36 months, eroding the value proposition that built the brand's loyal following.
In short
- OnePlus is exiting the US market after twelve years.
- Carrier support had already been fading since 2021-2022.
- US bill-credit financing undercut OnePlus's low-cost "flagship killer" appeal.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way â we don't pick a winner.
The case for
OnePlus's direct-to-consumer model, predicated on offering flagship specifications at lower upfront cost, was fundamentally misaligned with the US market's carrier-subsidy structure. When major carriers effectively subsidise premium phones, the proposition of buying quality at a lower upfront cost loses much of its appeal, and OnePlus's inability to penetrate beyond niche adoption across twelve yearsâremaining far below the Samsung-Apple duopolyâsuggests structural incompatibility rather than temporary difficulty.
The case against
OnePlus demonstrated genuine market potential through critical acclaim and initial customer adoption, proving the brand held real appeal to US consumers. Rather than facing insurmountable structural barriers, the company underinvested in execution: it lost carrier partnerships through insufficient commitment, didn't adequately market the brand to mainstream audiences, and failed to adapt its pricing strategy to the realities of carrier subsidies early enough. With different strategic choicesâsustained carrier investment, aggressive US marketing spend, or a more flexible pricing approachâOnePlus could have carved out meaningful market share.
Explained simply
OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer that launched in the United States in 2014 with an approach that differed sharply from established American brands. Rather than partnering with carriers, the company aimed to sell high-specification phones directly to customers at significantly lower prices than Apple and Samsung, building a loyal following based on offering premium technology for less upfront money.
The American smartphone market operates very differently to most other countries. The major carriersâT-Mobile, Verizon and othersâcontrol the vast majority of phone sales through subsidised payment plans stretched over two to three years, meaning customers do not pay the full price upfront. This undermined OnePlus's core advantage: on carrier payment plans, the price gap between OnePlus and established brands narrowed, eliminating the brand's key appeal.
Despite early promise, with roughly 200,000 customers using OnePlus phones on T-Mobile by 2018, the company never achieved meaningful market share. Carrier partnerships proved fragile: T-Mobile stopped stocking OnePlus's flagship phones after 2022, and Verizon's involvement lasted only two years. Apple and Samsung controlled around 90 per cent of carrier phone sales in 2020, leaving little opportunity for challengers to establish themselves.
Americas Business Markets World