Owner Of ‘Heated Rivalry’ Cottage Did “Soul Searching” Before Agreeing To Season 2: “I’m A Private Guy”

← Back to the feed

Owner Of ‘Heated Rivalry’ Cottage Did “Soul Searching” Before Agreeing To Season 2: “I’m A Private Guy”

Developing story first seen 2 hours ago

Deadline · 2 hours ago

Michael Kutryk, the Toronto doctor who owns the Muskoka cottage used as Shane's lakeside home in the Season 1 finale of "Heated Rivalry", has newly revealed that he did "a little bit of soul searching" before agreeing to let the production return for Season 2. Speaking to HGTV, he said he felt he could have pushed for more money but chose not to, understanding the show's needs despite calling himself "a private guy" who values the property as a personal retreat.

Kutryk originally charged the production "almost nothing" due to its small budget, and recounted that the 45-person crew scratched his table without ultimately replacing it, though he still named "a very reasonable price" for the return visit, which producers accepted with surprise. He only learned of the source novel's explicit content after listening to Rachel Reid's audiobook, and separately turned down a keen Airbnb booking in favour of another rental company's offer, while remaining unsure whether he'll rent the cottage out again after Season 2 airs. Season 2, which recently began filming in Canada with a cast including Justice Smith, Charlie Gillespie and Emily Hampshire, is due to premiere in spring 2027.

  • Cottage owner Michael Kutryk agreed to host "Heated Rivalry" Season 2 filming
  • He priced it reasonably despite tight budget and a scratched table
  • Season 2 films in Canada now, premieres spring 2027

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Allowing the production to return can be seen as a fair-minded choice that supports a creative project which has grown beyond its modest first-season means. The owner has first-hand knowledge of the location’s importance to the story and can negotiate terms that recognise both the crew’s needs and the property’s value, while enabling fans and local production work to benefit. This view places weight on cooperation, artistic continuity and a reasonable commercial arrangement.

The case against

Declining further filming would also be entirely reasonable, given that the cottage is a private retreat rather than merely a business asset. A large crew, prior damage that was not resolved as expected, the programme’s explicit content and possible effects on future rentals all give the owner legitimate reasons to protect his property, privacy and reputation. This view places weight on clear consent, respect for personal space and adequate compensation for the disruption and risk involved.

More coverage

Americas Entertainment TV World

Read the full article at the source →