Overusing AI may hinder learning, curiosity and independent thought
The article argues that growing reliance on AI and other convenient digital tools may weaken people’s capacity for independent thought and learning. Psychologist Carly Dober says that avoiding mental effort can reduce curiosity and problem-solving, while technology’s ease and appeal make it tempting to outsource everyday tasks.
The piece describes “cognitive offloading”, where AI does work that might otherwise build neural connections, and warns of automation bias and complacency: trusting technology over correct information and checking it less carefully. It also raises concerns about privacy, noting that people often exchange personal data for convenience despite saying they value privacy. Dober’s proposed response is to switch off at times and make room for discomfort and boredom.
In short
- AI convenience may come at a cost to independent thinking.
- Overtrust can make people less likely to question errors.
- Dober recommends making space for boredom and effort.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Relying heavily on AI for tasks that would otherwise require practice may reduce opportunities to build knowledge, problem-solving skills and confidence in independent judgement. If people accept outputs without checking them, errors can go unnoticed, while routine sharing of personal information may create privacy risks. Making time to think through problems without digital assistance could help preserve these abilities.
The case against
AI and other tools can make information and support more accessible, save time and reduce the effort spent on routine tasks, leaving more room for work that benefits from human attention. Using a tool does not necessarily prevent learning: people can question its answers, check sources and use it as a prompt for further study. The effects may depend on how and when technology is used, rather than on convenience itself.
Explained simply
AI tools can generate text, answer questions and handle tasks that people might otherwise work through themselves. Psychologist Carly Dober is among those examining how relying on these tools could affect the way people learn and think.
One concern is “cognitive offloading”: letting technology do mental work that might otherwise help people build knowledge and problem-solving skills. People may also trust automated answers too readily or check them less carefully, even when they are wrong.
The debate matters as AI becomes part of everyday life, raising questions about how people can benefit from convenience while protecting their ability to think independently. It also touches on privacy, as using digital services can involve sharing personal information.
AI Americas Business Technology World
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “Relying on AI is rotting your brain. But here’s what you can do about it | Carly Dober”.