Republican congressman to force impeachment vote on Defence Secretary Hegseth

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters of Massie’s effort could argue that sustained military action without clear congressional authorisation raises serious constitutional and democratic accountability concerns. A vote would require lawmakers to address those concerns publicly, and replacing Hegseth could offer the president a chance to reset policy before a change in congressional control.

The case against

Opponents could argue that impeachment is an extraordinary remedy and that the allegations should be assessed through established oversight and legal processes before pursuing removal. They may also contend that Hegseth’s leadership and the administration’s handling of the conflict are matters for the president and Congress to debate, while a vote unlikely to pass risks turning a grave constitutional question into partisan manoeuvring.