← Back to the feed

REVEALED: What five Sydney Swans stars did to get stood down for the rest of the season – as club boss blasts late-night drinking and bringing women back to hotel

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

Daily Mail ·

The Sydney Swans have stood down five AFL players — Riley Bice, Nick Blakey, Isaac Heeney, James Jordon and Chad Warner — for the remainder of the 2026 season after finding they breached the club's standards by staying out late, drinking and bringing women back to the team's Melbourne hotel. Chief executive Matthew Pavlich said the players fell well short of expected behaviour, though he stressed the sanctions were separate from an ongoing Victoria Police investigation into an alleged sexual assault involving Swans players at the same hotel, and that the club remained supportive of the players.

The players will miss selection for the rest of the season, including finals, but will still be allowed at the club. The incident followed the team's 36-point win over Essendon, after which several players were questioned by police over the alleged assault, said to stem from a dispute over a perceived breach of a woman's personal boundaries. Pavlich clarified that coach Dean Cox and other staff who were also out late that night had attended a separate, pre-arranged staff gathering and were not implicated. Club chairman Andrew Pridham apologised to fans, members and sponsors, calling it a "sad day" for the club and saying the five players were "extremely remorseful".

  • Five Sydney Swans players stood down for rest of 2026 season
  • Breaches involved late-night drinking and women at team hotel
  • Separate police probe continues into alleged sexual assault claim

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters of the club's swift and severe response argue that professional sporting organisations have a duty of care to set and enforce clear standards of behaviour, particularly given the seriousness of a concurrent police investigation into an alleged sexual assault. They would say that decisive action, even before any criminal findings are made, demonstrates that the club takes player conduct and the safety of others seriously, and that failing to act firmly risks normalising behaviour that endangers the club's reputation and, more importantly, the wellbeing of those affected.

The case against

Others would caution that standing players down for the remainder of the season on the basis of an internal club review, rather than any legal finding, risks blurring the line between breaches of team rules such as curfews and drinking, and the far more serious separate allegation under police investigation. They would argue that conflating the two, and imposing what amounts to a season-ending sanction before charges are laid or due process concludes, could unfairly damage the careers and reputations of players who may not ultimately be found to have done anything unlawful.

More coverage

Business Cybersecurity Markets Technology World

Read the full article at the source →