World news and discussion on TalkFuse.
Russell Brand says he may have exposed himself without consent in US deposition
Russell Brand told a sworn deposition in a US civil case that he felt he “must have” exposed himself to women without their consent, though he said he could not remember doing so. The statement contrasts with his denial of non-consensual sexual activity during his UK criminal case, in which he was convicted of one rape and three sexual assaults.
The New York lawsuit was brought by a woman identified as Jane Doe, who alleges Brand exposed himself and sexually assaulted her while filming *Arthur* in 2010; Brand has maintained that his sexual encounters were consensual. She is seeking an undisclosed sum and also alleges negligence by Warner Bros and other production companies. Brand faces a separate civil claim in London seeking about £100,000.
In short
- Brand said he “must have” exposed himself without consent.
- The statement was made under oath in a US civil case.
- He was convicted of one rape and three sexual assaults in the UK.
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Daily Mail as “Russell Brand admits he ‘must have’ exposed himself to women without their consent under oath in America”.