Russell Brand Trial: Woman Details Alleged Rape After Asking Her to Take Photos of Him Half-Naked
Developing story first seen 1 hour ago
A woman has told police that Russell Brand raped her in a hotel room during the 1999 Labour Party conference in Bournemouth. Her account was shown to jurors on the second day of his trial, where she said a 2023 television documentary prompted her to report the alleged assault.
She alleges Brand appeared half-naked, made her take photographs of him, then pushed her onto a bed and raped her despite her saying no. Brand denies all the allegations and has pleaded not guilty to seven charges involving six women, relating to incidents alleged to have taken place between 1999 and 2009. The judge said the documentary would not be shown to jurors.
- A complainant described an alleged 1999 rape to police.
- Her interview was shown on the second day of Brand’s trial.
- Brand denies seven charges involving six women.
New here? Start with this
Russell Brand is a comedian and broadcaster who faces criminal charges over alleged sexual offences. The charges relate to six women and incidents said to have taken place between 1999 and 2009.
Brand denies the allegations and has pleaded not guilty. The case concerns what the women say happened and whether the prosecution can prove the charges in court; the allegations have not been established as fact.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The woman’s account, as reported to police and presented to the jury, describes force and a clear refusal; if the jury accepts it, that would support the prosecution’s case that the encounter was rape. The prosecution can argue that the documentary’s prompting her to report in 2023 does not by itself make her account unreliable, and that the evidence should be assessed on its merits.
The case against
Brand denies the allegation and has pleaded not guilty, so the defence can argue that the prosecution must prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt and that an allegation is not proof. It may ask the jury to examine the account and supporting evidence carefully, including the passage of time before the report, while respecting the judge’s decision that the documentary itself will not be shown.