World news and discussion on TalkFuse.
Russell Brand’s sickening one-letter ‘secret code’ nickname for victim
Developing story first seen 4 hours ago
New details from Russell Brand’s trial show he saved a woman’s number in his phone as “T”, which he said meant “tart”, alongside “AP” and two asterisks. The entry, found on an iPhone during a forensic examination, was questioned by prosecutors and became a significant part of his evidence in the rape case.
Brand said “AP” referred to anal play during a consensual encounter backstage at the Hammersmith Apollo in 2009, and that the asterisks reminded him not to forget it. The woman, then 21, said Brand raped her at his home after she repeatedly told him to stop; he denied the allegation, but the jury convicted him of rape. He was also found guilty of three sexual assaults involving other women, cleared of two other rape charges and attempted indecent assault, and is due to be sentenced on 9 November.
- Sources
- 2
- Outlets
- 2
- Left · Centre · Right
- 0 · 0 · 2
In short
- A coded contact entry featured prominently in Brand’s rape trial.
- Brand said the entry referred to a consensual encounter.
- He was convicted of rape and three sexual assaults.
How this story developed
- 2 hours ago A coded phone entry linking a woman to “tart” and “anal play” featured in Russell Brand’s rape trial and was challenged by prosecutors.
- 2 hours ago New details from Russell Brand’s trial show he saved a woman’s number in his phone as “T”, which he said meant “tart”, alongside “AP” and two asterisks.
Full account
Russell Brand has been convicted of rape and three sexual assaults following a trial at Southwark Crown Court. Among the evidence jurors heard was a contact entry on an iPhone 5 belonging to Brand, in which a woman’s number was saved under the letter “T”, alongside “AP” and two asterisks. The woman, who was 21 when she met Brand in 2009, cannot be identified for legal reasons.
Asked about the entry in court, Brand said “T” meant “tart” and “AP” referred to anal play. He said the asterisks were a reminder of the encounter, describing it as one he should never forget. The woman said Brand later raped her at his north London home, despite her telling him to stop. He denied the allegation and said the sex was consensual; the jury found him guilty. Prosecutors also questioned why he had not mentioned the contact entry in a police interview in July 2025, after he had earlier said he could not remember the woman or the incident.
The second report adds a more detailed account of the woman’s contact with Brand before the assault, including an encounter after a performance at the Hammersmith Apollo and later messages from him. It also describes her subsequent distress and the effect on her life. These details are presented as testimony and reporting from the trial; the first report focuses more narrowly on the phone entry and Brand’s explanations for it.
The case concerned allegations by six women about events between 1999 and 2009. Brand was also convicted of three sexual assaults involving other women, while the jury acquitted him of two other rape charges and attempted indecent assault. The first report says he was remanded in custody after the verdicts and is due to be sentenced on 9 November. The second emphasises the broader allegations about his conduct and the impact described by the women.
Where outlets differ
From the full account, which is AI-written from the sources:
The first report centres on the forensic phone evidence, Brand’s explanation of the initials and symbols, and his earlier claim that he could not recall the woman or incident. The second places the entry in a wider account of the trial, adding details about the woman’s experiences and the reported impact on her life, as well as allegations about Brand’s behaviour towards women more generally.
The first report says the encounter referred to by “AP” took place backstage at the Hammersmith Apollo. The second describes drinks and an encounter backstage after Brand approached fans in the venue foyer, then recounts a later visit to his home. They differ in how they describe the setting and sequence of events.
Explained simply
Russell Brand is a British comedian and broadcaster who faced criminal charges over allegations by several women. The case concerned incidents said to have taken place between 1999 and 2005, including rape and sexual assault.
Brand denied the charges. A jury convicted him of rape and three sexual assaults, and cleared him of two other rape charges and attempted indecent assault. The case matters because it involved serious allegations about a prominent public figure and was decided by a jury in a criminal court.
Coverage · 2 sources
Bias meters
From 2 rated sources.