Video games news, releases, esports and culture — all the biggest gaming stories in one place.
Sam Altman is annoyed his DRAM comment was ‘taken out of context’
Sam Altman said his comments about personal computers using the world’s limited DRAM supply were taken out of context. He was discussing the case for running AI models in data centres, where memory can be used more intensively, but many PC gamers heard his remarks as criticism of people keeping memory in their own computers.
Altman said he wants people to have as much memory as they want and has long argued for increasing production. His clarification has done little to ease anger over rising hardware costs, which the article links to AI demand; it notes a PlayStation Pro priced at $900 ahead of GTA 6’s release. The dispute also reflects fears that AI and gaming could move towards cloud computing, leaving users with less control over their hardware.
In short
- Altman says his DRAM remarks were taken out of context.
- He supports greater memory production and abundant supply.
- Gamers worry AI demand could mean pricier hardware and more cloud gaming.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Altman’s remarks can reasonably be read as an argument about how scarce memory is used, rather than a criticism of people who want powerful personal computers. If data centres can use memory more intensively to run models, that may make a case for expanding shared computing capacity while increasing production, as Altman says he supports.
The case against
PC users can reasonably hear the comments as dismissive when AI demand is already associated with higher hardware costs and could make memory harder to obtain. They may also worry that shifting computing towards data centres would weaken users’ control over their own machines and make gaming more dependent on cloud services.