Sanders pushes ‘death penalty’ for crucial US industry that could give advantage to foreign adversaries
Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Greg Casar have introduced legislation that would impose severe criminal and corporate penalties on American artificial intelligence developers, including up to 20 years in prison for individuals and a "corporate death penalty" that would strip firms of their legal right to operate in the United States. The Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act would temporarily halt development of advanced AI and create a new Cabinet-level agency with authority to oversee the destruction of non-compliant systems, drawing a direct comparison to laws governing illegal nuclear weapons development. Critics, including technology policy experts, warn that such a unilateral crackdown would cripple US innovation while leaving rivals such as China and Russia free to continue advancing their own AI capabilities unchecked.
The bill specifically targets AI systems capable of matching or exceeding human cognitive performance, banning any model able to resist shutdown commands, carry out unauthorised cyberattacks, or act to undermine the US government. Enforcement would fall to a newly created federal agency empowered to physically remove dangerous code and oversee the destruction of non-compliant hardware. Experts including Daniel Castro of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation and AI researcher Gary Marcus argue the proposal is too broad and would guarantee America falls behind in AI development, while industry group Chamber of Progress described it as "knee-jerk policymaking."
In short
- Sanders and Casar propose criminal penalties for advanced AI development
- Bill includes 20-year jail terms and a "corporate death penalty"
- Critics say it would let China and Russia gain an AI advantage
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters could argue that AI systems able to evade shutdown, launch unauthorised cyberattacks or threaten government functions pose risks too serious to leave to voluntary industry safeguards. A temporary halt and enforceable penalties could prevent dangerous capabilities from spreading while giving public authorities time to establish oversight, much as strict controls apply to other high-consequence technologies.
The case against
Opponents could argue that a sweeping US ban would drive research and investment elsewhere without stopping development by foreign rivals, weakening American competitiveness and security. They may also see severe criminal penalties and broad government powers over companies and technology as disproportionate, risking useful research and lawful innovation when targeted rules could address specific dangers.
Explained simply
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computer systems that can perform tasks such as generating text, analysing information or writing code. Developers train these systems using data and computing power, and governments are debating how to manage risks as the technology becomes more capable.
Bernie Sanders is a US senator, and Greg Casar is a member of the House of Representatives; both are elected federal lawmakers. Their proposed bill would restrict development of AI systems with advanced capabilities and create a federal agency to enforce the rules, including by removing or destroying systems judged to breach them.
The debate involves how to reduce potential dangers while preserving research and commercial development. It also raises questions about competition: the United States develops AI alongside countries such as China and Russia, whose governments would not be bound by a US law.
Americas Art Asia Culture Europe World