Saudi Arabia’s terrified Crown prince MBS ‘is moving between heavily guarded palaces with bunkers as Houthi attacks intensify’
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has reportedly spent six days moving between guarded palaces with bunkers as Houthi missile attacks on Riyadh intensify. The reported security measures come amid deadly strikes on the capital and growing concern about attacks on civilian sites and transport.
The article says an airport strike on Sunday killed one person and injured 11, following a strike the previous day that reportedly killed 13 and injured more than 300. Schools in Riyadh have switched to remote learning, while the US says it is considering involvement and the UK and EU have condemned the attacks; Britain has also advised its nationals to avoid King Khalid International Airport until it is secure.
- MBS is reportedly moving between guarded palaces amid intensified Houthi attacks.
- Airport strikes have caused deaths and hundreds of reported injuries.
- Schools have shifted to remote learning as international concern grows.
New here? Start with this
The Houthis are an armed group based in Yemen that has been in conflict with Saudi Arabia for years. The group emerged from Yemen's civil war, during which Saudi Arabia led a military campaign against them. Over time, the Houthis have developed missile and drone technology and have repeatedly launched attacks across the border into Saudi territory.
Mohammed bin Salman, known as MBS, is Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince and the country's de facto leader. Reports of him moving between heavily defended palaces with bunkers highlight how escalating Houthi attacks have created concerns at the highest levels of government. Such security measures are unusual indicators of the threat Saudi officials believe they now face.
The Houthi attacks have affected civilian life in major Saudi cities, including the capital Riyadh. Several countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union, have responded with concern and diplomatic statements. The international attention reflects how the conflict in Yemen has consequences far beyond that country's borders.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Houthi missile and drone strikes have demonstrably killed civilians and damaged critical infrastructure including airports, forcing schools to move to remote learning and prompting international travel warnings. Saudi Arabia faces a genuine security threat from a militant group actively conducting these attacks, and the Crown Prince's security precautions during this military campaign are reasonable protective measures. The international concern for civilian safety reflects legitimate worries about the ongoing threat to people and vital infrastructure.
The case against
The Houthi campaign must be understood within the context of years of Saudi military intervention in Yemen, which has caused extensive humanitarian harm and casualties. Whilst the attacks demonstrably occur, critics argue that characterising them as pure terrorism obscures the political reality—the Houthis view their strikes on Saudi targets as resistance to foreign military aggression rather than unprovoked violence. From this perspective, a more productive international approach would pressure Saudi Arabia to end military intervention and pursue diplomatic settlement, rather than simply reinforcing military defences that perpetuate the conflict cycle.