Secret Service deputy director suddenly quits after series of security blunders as Trump threats escalate
Secret Service Deputy Director Matt Quinn has announced he is leaving the agency, amid growing scrutiny of its handling of security threats. His departure follows several high-profile incidents and comes as officials report a sharp increase in threats against people under the agency’s protection.
Quinn, a former agent with 23 years’ service, retired in 2021 and returned as deputy director last May. In a recent interview, he called drone swarms a major threat and said the problem was not solved; Director Sean Curran said the agency had handled about 10,000 threat cases since January, 40 per cent more than over the same period last year. A government report also found the agency missed multiple opportunities to detect and disrupt the gunman who attacked Donald Trump at a 2024 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
- Matt Quinn is leaving as Secret Service deputy director.
- The agency has handled about 10,000 threat cases since January.
- Officials say cases rose 40 per cent year on year.
New here? Start with this
The US Secret Service protects the president, former presidents and other senior officials, and investigates threats against them. Its work includes assessing warnings and securing public events, where it may coordinate with local police and other agencies.
The agency’s director oversees its operations, while the deputy director helps manage them. Matt Quinn is a former Secret Service agent who returned to the agency as deputy director; Donald Trump is among the people it protects.
The agency has faced scrutiny over security at a 2024 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where a gunman attacked Trump. Reports of more threats and concerns about risks such as drones have also drawn attention to how the Secret Service identifies and responds to danger.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Quinn’s departure could be seen as a sign that the agency is taking accountability for serious security failures and making room for change. With threats rising sharply and a government report identifying missed chances to stop the Butler attacker, supporters of a leadership reset may argue that fresh oversight and urgency are needed to rebuild public confidence.
The case against
A sudden departure does not by itself show that Quinn was responsible for the failures or that replacing him will improve security. Given his long service and the growing, varied threats facing the agency, defenders may argue that continuity and a careful review of systems, staffing and resources are more useful than treating one senior departure as a remedy.