Silicon Valley’s 10 highest-paid executives revealed… and a relatively unknown 34-year-old wunderkind is top with eye-popping $864million paycheck
Figma co-founder and chief executive Dylan Field topped a ranking of Silicon Valley’s highest-paid executives, with reported compensation of $864 million. The figure puts him well ahead of the next-ranked executive and highlights the exceptional pay packages associated with technology companies.
The ranking, based on data from several databases and compiled in late September 2026, placed Netskope chief Sanjay Beri second on $235 million, followed by Broadcom’s Hock Eng Tan on $205 million. Other named executives included Figma’s Kris Rasmussen on $175 million, Palo Alto Networks’ Nikesh Arora on $100 million and Apple executive chairman Tim Cook on $75 million; Hims & Hers Health’s Mohamed Elshenawy completed the top ten on $61 million.
- Dylan Field led the ranking with $864 million in compensation.
- Netskope’s Sanjay Beri was second on $235 million.
- The top ten included executives from technology, finance and healthcare firms.
New here? Start with this
Silicon Valley's most senior executives earn extraordinarily high compensation packages from their technology company roles. A newly compiled ranking shows how much the best-paid leaders receive annually through salary, bonuses, shares and other benefits.
Dylan Field, co-founder and chief executive of design software company Figma, tops the ranking with reported compensation of $864 million. He is followed by Sanjay Beri of Netskope on $235 million, Hock Eng Tan of Broadcom on $205 million, and executives from other major firms including Apple, Palo Alto Networks and Hims & Hers Health.
The figures highlight how much wealth technology companies distribute to their leaders. They also underscore the significant gap between executive compensation and the earnings of typical workers in the sector.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The executives commanding these salaries operate companies with enormous scope and responsibility, often taking substantial personal risk to build or lead transformative businesses. In competitive talent markets, premium compensation reflects the genuine scarcity of exceptional leadership capable of steering multi-billion-pound enterprises; shareholders approve these packages because they understand the executives' decisions directly drive extraordinary value creation. The market mechanisms here function properly—if investors deemed compensation excessive relative to returns, they would withhold approval.
The case against
Such extreme compensation raises legitimate questions about whether any individual's contribution genuinely merits $800 million relative to the thousands of employees whose collective efforts generate company value. The vast pay disparity reflects structural advantages and market power rather than pure meritocratic reward; moreover, when boards set executive pay (often influenced by management), the usual competitive discipline of labour markets doesn't fully apply. These escalating compensation packages may incentivise short-term shareholder price manipulation over sustainable value creation, whilst concentrating wealth in ways that reduce resources for employee development and undermine social cohesion.