Ski village revamp plans progress, says developer
Plans to redevelop Sheffield’s former Ski Village at Parkwood Springs have advanced after New Zealand adventure tourism company Skyline Enterprises agreed a deal with Sheffield City Council. The project could bring new leisure facilities to a site closed since a 2012 fire, supporting the city’s “Outdoor City” identity and broader investment in the surrounding country park.
Proposals include a luge ride and family playground, with a zipline and surf-wave attraction planned longer term. The scheme is supported by a £19.4m government Levelling Up grant, while the council has allocated £12m for nearby road and junction improvements; a public consultation is expected in September before a planning application later this year.
- Skyline agrees deal to redevelop Sheffield’s former Ski Village.
- Plans include a luge, playground, zipline and surf wave.
- Consultation is expected before a planning application this year.
New here? Start with this
Sheffield's Ski Village at Parkwood Springs was forced to close in 2012 after a fire, leaving the site largely unused for over a decade. The location sits within Parkwood Springs country park, which Sheffield City Council is developing as part of a broader effort to establish the city as an "Outdoor City" with enhanced leisure and recreational facilities.
Adventure tourism company Skyline Enterprises, which operates similar attractions internationally, is taking the lead on redeveloping the former Ski Village site. The project is supported by a £19.4m government Levelling Up grant, with Sheffield City Council also investing £12m in nearby road and infrastructure improvements.
Plans for the site include an initial phase with a luge ride and family playground, followed by longer-term attractions such as a zipline and an artificial surf-wave facility. The council will conduct public consultation before submitting a formal planning application.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters can argue that redeveloping a long-closed site would restore a neglected part of the city, create family leisure facilities and strengthen Sheffield’s outdoor tourism offer. The public grant and council road investment could help unlock wider benefits for the surrounding area, while consultation and planning scrutiny give residents a chance to shape the proposals.
The case against
Sceptics can reasonably question whether public money and road investment are justified for a commercial leisure scheme, particularly while other local needs compete for funding. They may also worry that new attractions could bring traffic, noise or pressure on the country park, and argue that these costs and environmental effects should be carefully assessed before the project proceeds.