Skrillex Issues Apology After Head Trip Set: ‘Will Take The L and Make a Lesson Of It’
Skrillex apologised for his 11 October set at Head Trip, saying the sound and performance were poor and that he would learn from the experience. His statement followed discussion among livestream viewers, some of whom reported distorted audio and apparent problems with the festival’s sound towers.
Reports were mixed: other viewers said they noticed no problems and thought the set was largely good. Skrillex performed on the festival’s second day alongside acts including Calvin Harris and Swedish House Mafia. The one-off event took place on the Coachella grounds in Indio, California.
- Skrillex apologised for his Head Trip set.
- Some livestream viewers reported clipped, distorted sound.
- Audience reactions to the performance were mixed.
New here? Start with this
Skrillex is the stage name of Sonny Moore, an American electronic music producer and DJ known for dance music made with synthesised sounds and strong bass. DJs perform by mixing recorded tracks, often using a festival sound system built to reach a large crowd.
Head Trip was a one-off dance music event held on the grounds used for the Coachella festival in Indio, California. Skrillex played on its second day, on a bill that also included Calvin Harris and Swedish House Mafia.
Large festivals use sound towers to carry music across wide outdoor sites, and problems with the equipment can affect what audiences hear. Viewers watching a livestream had differing impressions of Skrillex’s set, so the discussion reflects reports from some viewers rather than a shared assessment.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Skrillex’s apology takes responsibility for a set that some viewers experienced as distorted or poorly delivered, and acknowledging that shortfall can show respect for fans who expected a better performance. Treating the experience as a lesson may also help the artist and organisers address any sound or production problems at future events.
The case against
The criticism may not reflect what everyone heard: some viewers reported no problems and considered the set good, so a broad apology could give a mixed response more weight than it deserves. If the sound issues came from the festival’s equipment or livestream rather than Skrillex’s performance, assigning responsibility to him alone may also oversimplify what happened.