Sorry ‘Jury Duty’ Fans, Season 3 Is Unlikely To Set Sail On The Open Waters
Amazon has greenlit a third instalment of the prank-based comedy following its second season success. Viewers have enthusiastically proposed relocating the show to a cruise ship, a concept that cast and crew have discussed as a potential way to raise the scale and ambition of future storylines.
Producers have ruled out this direction, contending that the programme's strength lies in placing unsuspecting participants in ordinary, relatable situations. Executive producer Anthony King explained that the real creative challenge involves discovering authentic human connection within mundane settings like jury duty and company retreats, rather than contriving excitement through exotic locations. The writers' room will continue building character arcs and unpredictable scenarios within this grounded approach for the upcoming season.
- Amazon has renewed Jury Duty for a third season; fan speculation about a cruise ship setting has been rejected by producers
- The show's creative team believes its appeal comes from mundane, everyday premises rather than spectacular ones, and will expand scope within grounded settings
New here? Start with this
Jury Duty is a comedy series built around an unsuspecting participant who believes they are taking part in an ordinary event. The other people involved are actors, and the situations are planned, while the participant’s reactions are real.
The programme has used familiar settings such as a jury trial and a company retreat. Its producers and writers shape the story around the people and their interactions, aiming to find comedy in everyday situations.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Escalating the show to a cruise ship would maintain its core appeal of ordinary people in confined social situations whilst offering expanded scope and visual freshness. A new setting could provide diverse scenarios and keep the format feeling ambitious and contemporary rather than repetitive, all whilst preserving the authentic, unscripted human interactions that define the comedy.
The case against
The show's genuine creative strength lies in discovering authentic human connection and comedy within mundane, relatable settings that audiences recognise from their own lives. Introducing exotic locations would sacrifice this grounded authenticity by prioritising spectacle; the real artistic challenge—and what makes the comedy meaningful—is crafting compelling moments around jury duty and office retreats rather than inherently dramatic backdrops.