Prince Harry booed by Leicester Tigers fans during Gloucester match
Prince Harry attended a Premiership rugby match between Leicester Tigers and Gloucester at Welford Road stadium on Friday night, marking one of his solo public outings since returning to the UK with his family in August. When he appeared on the stadium's big screen during the first half, audible booing erupted from the crowd of approximately 18,000 spectators, prompting TV commentator Nick Mullins to remark that it was "not overly welcoming."
Harry, aged 42, was accompanied by his cousin George McCorquodale and Andrea Pinchen, the Tigers' chief executive. Online supporters of the Sussexes insisted the crowd was jeering referee Karl Dickson following a scrum decision, not the duke himself. However, broadcast analysis reveals this explanation is implausible: the referee made his decision at 26 minutes 38 seconds, but the booing did not begin until 26 minutes 54 seconds, a 16-second gap. Harry served as patron of the Rugby Football Union from 2016 to 2021.
- Prince Harry booed at rugby match as he appeared on stadium screen
- Supporters claim crowd was jeering referee over scrum decision
- Timing of booing contradicts the referee explanation
New here? Start with this
Prince Harry is a member of the British royal family and the younger son of the late Princess Diana. He stepped back from his royal duties in 2020 and has since lived primarily in the United States with his wife Meghan and their two children. In August, the family returned to the UK to take up residence.
Prince Harry served as patron of the Rugby Football Union from 2016 until 2021, establishing a connection with the sport. Rugby union is one of Britain's major sports, and the Premiership is its top professional league. Leicester Tigers is one of England's most established rugby clubs and plays its home matches at Welford Road stadium.
His public appearances in the UK have been relatively infrequent since the family's return in August. This is why his attendance at the match on Friday drew attention from the stadium crowd and broadcasters.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Those who view the booing as inappropriate argue that whatever disagreements exist regarding Harry's personal choices, heckling a member of the Royal Family at a public sporting event represents an erosion of public civility. They contend that basic respect for individuals should transcend political or personal disagreements, and that the proper venue for expression of disapproval is through media and democratic discourse rather than public heckling. The distinction between criticising someone's actions and showing disrespect to their person matters, they argue, to maintaining social cohesion.
The case against
Those who defend the booing argue that Harry, as a public figure who has actively engaged in public discourse about his own grievances, should not be exempted from public expression of disapproval. They contend that free expression includes the right to voice dissent toward public figures, and that booing represents one of the mildest and most traditional forms of such expression. The expectation that members of the Royal Family should be immune from public disapproval, they maintain, privileges them unfairly within a democratic society.
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Daily Mail as “That’s not much of a welcome, TV commentator quips as rowdy rugby fans boo Harry – while Sussex Squad insists they were jeering the referee”.