Olise’s brilliance shows what football’s awards cannot fully capture
Michael Olise came on for Ousmane Dembélé in France’s Nations League match against Belgium and helped turn a difficult game into a rout. The article argues that the crowd’s anticipation and response to Olise reveal a kind of footballing greatness that awards such as the Ballon d’Or cannot fully capture.
France equalised through Désiré Doué before Olise assisted Rayan Cherki in the 80th minute and scored twice in the final minutes. It was Olise’s fourth goal in four matches; the article also notes that he provided seven assists at the World Cup. His calm, graceful style, the writer suggests, should not be mistaken for a lack of effort.
- Olise changed France’s match against Belgium after coming on.
- He assisted once and scored twice in the final minutes.
- The article says football’s wonder exceeds individual awards.
New here? Start with this
Michael Olise is a French footballer who has recently gained significant attention for his international performances. The Nations League is an annual tournament for European national teams, held outside the main football calendar, and provides a regular stage for international football between major competitions.
Olise has demonstrated consistently excellent recent form, regularly scoring goals and providing assists, including notably during international football's larger tournaments. He played in a Nations League match against Belgium where his performance contributed to France's success.
The article raises a broader question about how football measures and recognises excellence at the highest level. It argues that some aspects of what makes a player truly great—such as the elegance of their play, their capacity to shift a match's direction, or the response they provoke from supporters—are not always fully captured by major individual awards and the voting systems that decide them.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Even with well-intentioned voting, football awards rely heavily on quantifiable metrics and visible moments, potentially overlooking dimensions of excellence that manifest in subtle tactical impact rather than goal tallies. The crowd's immediate recognition of Olise's presence suggests awareness of something genuinely valuable—a quality of footballing intelligence and grace—that formal award processes might miss.
The case against
Modern football awards involve hundreds of informed observers who regularly watch matches and possess expertise to recognise nuanced excellence beyond basic statistics. If a player's brilliance is as substantial as claimed, it should surface through consistent success across competitions and award categories, rather than compelling single-match performances, suggesting that subjective impressions might sometimes be overstated.
Entertainment Europe Football Music Sport World
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “The Ballon d’Or doesn’t capture football’s wonder – Michael Olise is proof | Zito Madu”.