← Back to the feed

The one classic rock band both Pete Townshend and Keith Richards couldn’t stand: “We were copied”

Far Out ·

Pete Townshend and Keith Richards both disliked Led Zeppelin, arguing that the band’s heavy sound lost the swing and looseness they valued in rock ‘n’ roll. Their criticism matters as a reminder that a group now regarded as a classic was controversial among some of its most influential contemporaries.

Townshend said The Who had been copied, citing Led Zeppelin’s heavy drums, bass and guitar, and later said he disliked the band despite respecting its members. Richards praised Jimmy Page’s guitar playing and John Bonham’s power, but found the group musically hollow and too heavy-handed; the article also notes that Led Zeppelin’s debut came before The Who’s *Live at Leeds*.

  • Townshend and Richards both criticised Led Zeppelin’s sound.
  • They respected Page’s guitar playing and Bonham’s power.
  • The band’s heavy style divided listeners and critics.

New here? Start with this

Led Zeppelin, The Who and the Rolling Stones were British rock bands that rose to fame in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Led Zeppelin built a sound around loud electric guitar, bass and drums, while The Who were known for energetic performances and the Rolling Stones drew on blues and rhythm and blues.

Pete Townshend was The Who’s guitarist and songwriter; Keith Richards played guitar in the Rolling Stones. Their views reflect disagreements among musicians about what made rock compelling, including the balance between power, rhythm and looseness. Led Zeppelin’s influence and reputation grew over time, even as some fellow musicians criticised its style.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Townshend and Richards had a defensible musical criticism: Led Zeppelin’s weighty, tightly amplified sound could seem to leave less room for the swing, looseness and rhythmic interplay they prized. Townshend also felt the band drew on a sound The Who had helped establish, while Richards’s praise for Page and Bonham suggests his objection was to the overall musical approach rather than their ability.

The case against

Led Zeppelin’s heavy, forceful style was a deliberate artistic choice, not necessarily a failure of musicianship; its power and precision could offer a different kind of energy from the looseness Townshend and Richards preferred. The band’s debut preceded The Who’s Live at Leeds, which complicates any simple claim that Zeppelin copied that later record, and disagreement between influential peers does not settle the music’s merits.

Entertainment Music

Read the full article at the source →

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.