Three people killed in Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia airports, officials say
Houthi fighters claimed responsibility for attacks on two Saudi Arabian airports over two days, killing three people and wounding 36 others. The incidents mark a significant escalation in the intensifying conflict between the Iran-backed Houthis and Saudi Arabia-backed government forces in Yemen, bringing cross-border military action to target civilian infrastructure.
Two women, of Moroccan and Algerian nationality, were killed in the attack on Abha International Airport (28 wounded), and a male Sudanese resident died at King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh (8 wounded). Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree claimed the attacks used ballistic missiles and drones in response to Saudi airstrikes. The escalation comes as the Houthis, who control Yemen's north-west, have seized Red Sea territory including the strategic port of Mokha, prompting pro-government forces to declare all-out war and displacing over 200,000 people.
- Three killed as Houthis attack Saudi airports with missiles and drones
- Civilian deaths mark sharp escalation in Yemen conflict spreading across borders
- Over 200,000 displaced as forces battle for Red Sea control
New here? Start with this
The Houthis are a militant group that controls north-western Yemen and is backed by Iran. They have been fighting against Saudi Arabia-backed government forces in Yemen's ongoing civil war, which has displaced millions of people and created a severe humanitarian crisis.
Saudi Arabia has been heavily involved in Yemen's conflict since 2015, carrying out air campaigns against Houthi-controlled areas. The Houthis have responded with their own attacks, increasingly striking targets within Saudi Arabia itself, marking a shift towards cross-border military operations that directly threaten Saudi civilians and infrastructure.
The latest incidents represent an escalation in this ongoing conflict, with both sides expanding their operations and raising dangers to civilians. Attacks on airports are particularly significant as they target civilian infrastructure, and the deaths of non-combatants reflect the widening human toll of the Yemen war.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters contextualise these attacks as a defensive response to sustained Saudi military intervention in Yemen, arguing that a weaker party employing asymmetrical tactics represents legitimate armed resistance. They contend that Saudi airstrikes also inflict civilian casualties, and that understanding the Houthis' actions requires acknowledging their grievances about foreign intervention in their homeland and their efforts to defend their territory against external military forces.
The case against
Critics argue that deliberately targeting civilian airports and killing innocent bystanders—including foreign nationals uninvolved in the conflict—constitutes terrorism and violates international humanitarian law irrespective of political grievances. They maintain that distinguishing between military and civilian infrastructure is fundamental to legitimate armed conflict, and that such escalation harms the broader population whilst undermining any credible claim to fighting for a just cause.