Tommy Robinson’s Musk-funded Russia trip spurs call to defend UK democracy
The Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, has called for the UK to do more to defend its democracy after it emerged that Elon Musk's family foundation funded a trip to Russia for the far-right activist Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Errol Musk, the father of the billionaire tech mogul, told the Guardian that he had personally brought Robinson to Moscow, with costs covered by the Musk Foundation. Davey described Robinson as "a useful idiot for a hostile state", warning of the need to guard against "far-right thugs, shady tech bros and foreign interference".
Robinson appeared in Moscow last month, sharing footage from a luxury hotel and issuing calls for supporters to take to the streets following a knife attack in Belfast. His visit coincided with the Kremlin apparently forging links with European far-right figures, including the influencer Andrew Tate and his brother, who were also in Russia at the time. Errol Musk, a self-described Russophile who has previously met Vladimir Putin, said meetings alongside Robinson covered topics such as Russia's declining birth rate. Police stopped Robinson and seized his phones on his return to Britain, while the episode has renewed questions over UK authorities' use of X, the platform owned by Elon Musk.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
This visit represents a concerning pattern of Kremlin efforts to cultivate relationships with Western far-right figures capable of amplifying divisive narratives within democracies. Robinson's significant online following, combined with Russia's documented strategies of exploiting social divisions, raises legitimate national security concerns that warrant scrutiny. The involvement of Musk's platform, which possesses considerable influence over public discourse, compounds these concerns about how such connections could amplify divisive messaging at scale.
The case against
Individuals retain fundamental rights to travel and associate with others, including foreign officials, without facing accusations of being foreign agents. The concerns expressed rely substantially on inference about Russian intentions rather than demonstrated coordination or illegal activity, and attributing political views to foreign influence removes individual agency. Using national security as grounds to delegitimise political opponents—however objectionable—establishes a troubling precedent for restricting legitimate free speech and association.
Explained simply
Tommy Robinson is a far-right activist in Britain whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Last month he visited Moscow, a trip that was funded by Elon Musk's family foundation and arranged by Errol Musk, the billionaire's father.
The visit has raised questions about a potential connection between Robinson and the Russian state. Robinson was not alone in Moscow; other far-right figures from Europe were present at the same time, prompting concerns that the Kremlin may be cultivating relationships with extremist groups.
British politicians are concerned about what such connections might mean for the country's security and democracy. The visit forms part of a growing debate about foreign interference in British politics and the need for safeguards against hostile states building relationships with domestic extremist groups.