Trump-backed Mazzei wins in Oklahoma after nasty race devolves into drug tests and a car wreck

← Back to the feed

Trump-backed Mazzei wins in Oklahoma after nasty race devolves into drug tests and a car wreck

Developing story first seen 3 hours ago

Daily Mail · 3 hours ago

New reporting confirms Republican Mike Mazzei, the Trump-backed former Oklahoma state senator and budget secretary, won Tuesday's gubernatorial runoff over state attorney general Gentner Drummond by a single point, in a race that had appeared far from settled beforehand. The contest became one of the nastiest of the election cycle and offered another test of Donald Trump's ability to sway Republican primaries in governor's races, an arena where his endorsements have traditionally carried less weight than in Senate or House contests.

The latest details reveal the scale of spending behind the race: Mazzei loaned his own campaign an Oklahoma-record $11.6 million and outspent Drummond overall, roughly $12.3 million to $9.1 million across the primary and runoff, while Drummond put in $3 million of his own money but drew more from outside donors. Nearly $13 million more was spent by outside groups since 1 July, including over $3 million from the Club for Growth-linked School Freedom Fund attacking Drummond over his stance on Trump's impeachment, and close to $3 million from the rival Put Oklahoma 1st PAC targeting Mazzei over past support for tax rises. The campaign was also marked by a bitter row over health and drug-testing records, triggered by a debate exchange, in which Drummond released his medical records and a clean drug test and challenged Mazzei to do the same; Mazzei's own clean test followed, but Drummond argued it wasn't rigorous enough to detect longer-term substance use, an issue sharpened by Mazzei's serious 2008 car accident, which Mazzei says has not left him dependent on pain medication.

  • Trump-backed Mazzei beat Drummond by just one point in Oklahoma's GOP runoff
  • Mazzei spent $12.3m (incl. an $11.6m personal loan) versus Drummond's $9.1m
  • Outside groups poured in nearly $13m amid a bitter health and drug-test row

New here? Start with this

Republicans in Oklahoma have just chosen their candidate for governor through a runoff election, a second-round vote held because no candidate won enough support outright in the first primary. The two contenders were Mike Mazzei, a former state senator and state budget secretary who had Donald Trump's backing, and Gentner Drummond, the sitting state attorney general. The result matters partly because it tests whether Trump's endorsement can still swing a governor's race, a contest type where his influence has historically been weaker than in races for Congress.

The run-up to the vote was unusually bitter and expensive. Both men poured millions of their own money into the campaign, and outside groups linked to national political networks spent heavily attacking each candidate, turning the race into one of the costliest and most acrimonious of the cycle. It also became personal, with a dispute over health and drug-test records spilling into public view and touching on a serious car accident Mazzei was involved in back in 2008.

The outcome decides who represents the Republican Party in the race to become Oklahoma's next governor, a heavily Republican state where winning that nomination is often tantamount to winning the office itself.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters of the outcome argue that Mazzei earned his victory fairly, having built a substantial record as a state senator and budget secretary and having secured Donald Trump's backing precisely because primary voters wanted a proven fiscal conservative. They see his willingness to self-fund at record levels as a sign of conviction rather than impropriety, note that he too produced a clean drug test when challenged, and view Drummond's insistence that the test was insufficiently rigorous as an unfounded attempt to keep a fifteen-year-old car accident in the headlines rather than a legitimate line of inquiry. From this vantage point, voters weighed the claims and counter-claims and reached their own considered judgement.

The case against

Others argue that Drummond raised a fair point of public interest: voters are entitled to full assurance about a future governor's health and fitness for office, and a single drug test may not settle longer-term questions, so pressing for more rigorous disclosure was reasonable scrutiny rather than a smear. They also point to the scale of spending, including Mazzei's unprecedented personal loan to his own campaign and the millions poured in by outside groups on both sides, as evidence of a system where resources and outside PAC muscle can overshadow substantive debate on policy. On this view, the closeness of the final result suggests many voters shared these reservations even as Mazzei ultimately prevailed.

More coverage

Geopolitics Health Medicine Politics World

Read the full article at the source →