← Back to the feed

Trump-backed Mazzei wins in Oklahoma after nasty race devolves into drug tests and a car wreck

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

Daily Mail ·

Republican Mike Mazzei, a former Oklahoma state senator and budget secretary backed by Donald Trump, has won the state's gubernatorial runoff, narrowly defeating state attorney general Gentner Drummond by a single point. The contest was one of the nastiest of the election cycle, marked by personal attacks and a bitter dispute over the candidates' health, and served as another test of Trump's ability to influence Republican primaries in governor's races, a sphere where his endorsements have traditionally carried less sway than in Senate or House contests.

The race also became a major money battle, with Mazzei loaning his campaign an Oklahoma-record $11.6 million and outspending Drummond overall, roughly $12.3 million to $9.1 million across the primary and runoff, while Drummond contributed $3 million of his own funds but drew more from outside donors. A row over drug testing added a sharp edge to the contest: Drummond released his health records and a clean drug test, challenging Mazzei to follow suit, and although Mazzei did so, Drummond argued the test was inadequate for detecting substances over a longer period, an issue given added weight by Mazzei's serious 2008 car accident, which he has said does not leave him reliant on pain medication. Outside groups poured in almost $13 million more, with the Club for Growth-linked School Freedom Fund backing Mazzei and Put Oklahoma 1st opposing him over past support for tax rises.

  • Trump-backed Mike Mazzei won Oklahoma's GOP governor runoff by one point.
  • Race turned bitter over rivals' health records and drug tests.
  • Campaign spending topped $21 million between candidates, plus $13 million from outside groups.

New here? Start with this

Republicans in Oklahoma have just chosen their candidate for governor through a runoff election, a second-round vote held because no candidate won enough support outright in the first primary. The two contenders were Mike Mazzei, a former state senator and state budget secretary who had Donald Trump's backing, and Gentner Drummond, the sitting state attorney general. The result matters partly because it tests whether Trump's endorsement can still swing a governor's race, a contest type where his influence has historically been weaker than in races for Congress.

The run-up to the vote was unusually bitter and expensive. Both men poured millions of their own money into the campaign, and outside groups linked to national political networks spent heavily attacking each candidate, turning the race into one of the costliest and most acrimonious of the cycle. It also became personal, with a dispute over health and drug-test records spilling into public view and touching on a serious car accident Mazzei was involved in back in 2008.

The outcome decides who represents the Republican Party in the race to become Oklahoma's next governor, a heavily Republican state where winning that nomination is often tantamount to winning the office itself.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters of the outcome argue that Mazzei earned his victory fairly, having built a substantial record as a state senator and budget secretary and having secured Donald Trump's backing precisely because primary voters wanted a proven fiscal conservative. They see his willingness to self-fund at record levels as a sign of conviction rather than impropriety, note that he too produced a clean drug test when challenged, and view Drummond's insistence that the test was insufficiently rigorous as an unfounded attempt to keep a fifteen-year-old car accident in the headlines rather than a legitimate line of inquiry. From this vantage point, voters weighed the claims and counter-claims and reached their own considered judgement.

The case against

Others argue that Drummond raised a fair point of public interest: voters are entitled to full assurance about a future governor's health and fitness for office, and a single drug test may not settle longer-term questions, so pressing for more rigorous disclosure was reasonable scrutiny rather than a smear. They also point to the scale of spending, including Mazzei's unprecedented personal loan to his own campaign and the millions poured in by outside groups on both sides, as evidence of a system where resources and outside PAC muscle can overshadow substantive debate on policy. On this view, the closeness of the final result suggests many voters shared these reservations even as Mazzei ultimately prevailed.

More coverage

Geopolitics Health Medicine Politics World

Read the full article at the source →